Two civil revision petitions arising from execution proceedings were dismissed as infructuous after counsel for both sides jointly submitted that the execution petition itself had been closed by way of compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[34431
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:197 OF 2021 AND
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:121 OF 2021
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:197 OF 2021
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order Dated23.11.2020in E.A.No.67 of 2020 in E.P.No.145 ot2020 inO.S.No.239of 1998 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Medak District at Sanga Reddy.
Between:
...PETITIONERS
//
2
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 4 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in th() c:ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cct 1 nray be pleased To permit the Attorney i.e., A.VENKATESWAR REDDY to prcr -.cute the above case by all means on behalf of Petitioners/Revision Petitioner Nc ;. 1, 2 and 4.
lA NO: 5 OF 2021
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoL 1 rray be pteased To permit the Attorney i.e., V.KOUSAYLA DEVI to prosecute he above case by all means on behalf of Petitioners/Revision Petitioner Nos,6 to 3.
lA NO: 3 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr, lircumstances staled in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co r t may be pteased To suspend the Orders Daled 23.11.2020 in E.A.No.67 of :,- 20 in E P No.145 of 2020 in O.S.No.239 of't 998 on the file of Hon'ble Junir Civit Judge, Medak District at Sanga Reddy pending disposal of Civil Revision f etit on
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ) rc.rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co r t may be pteased To grant leave to the PetitionerV Revision Petitioners to r3 the Civit Revision Petition against the Order Daled 23.11.2020 in E.A.No.67 rr 2Ct2O rn E P.No.'145 of 2020 in O.S.No.239 of 1998 on the file of Hon'ble Jun c- Crvit Juctge, Medak District at Sanga Reddy.
Counsel for the Petitionerc: SRl. RESU MAHENDER Rt: )Dy
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI ZEESHAN AONAN Mr\ IMOOD
,/,/ // .//
J
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1z'.l F 2021
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitutionof lndia, againstthe non e,onsidering of EA.(CFR No.14 of 2021)in EP.No.145of 2020 on the file of the Prl. Junior civit Judge, at Sangareddy, wherein thecourt below refusedto order the change of description (based on newly assignedJurisdiction)of the Police Stationin implementing the order of Police Protection.
Between:
MAHENDER AGARWAL, Sonof late Om Prakash Agarwal,Aged about57 vears. Occupation Business,Resident of PlotNo. 1 04 and 105, Tirumurthy Co. bp. Sbciety,'Mehendra Hills,ll Venture, EastMarredpally, Secunderabad
...PETITIONER
ANO
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO:'f OF 2021
Petition under section151 CPCprayingthat rn the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the HighCourt may be pleased to direct the station House officer,Police stationBDL Bhanurto provide Police protection in favour of the Revision Petitionerin respect of the subject Property i.e., land admeasuring Ac.5-12Gts, in Sy.no 161/A, at KardanaruVillage, Patancheru Mandal, Medak forimplementation of the lnjunction orderspassed in favour of the Revision Petitionerin A.s.No.280f 2003 as confirrned in S.A.No.734 of 2004.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl.ZEESHAN ADNAN MAHMOOD
Counsel forthe Respondent:NONEAPPEARED
The Court made the following:COMMON ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAo NANDIKONDA CTVIL REVISION PEf,ITION l{os.197 6r L2L of 2O2L
COMMON ORI)ER:
When the matter is taken up for heari:t g, learned counsel for the respondents in C.R.p.No.t9T of 2O2L wlno is appearing on behalf of the petitioner in C.R.p.No.L2l tf 2O2L appeared virtually and submitted t].at both the rev.r io, petitions will become infructuous on ttre ground that tl.e :x€'cution petition itself was closed by way of the compromise ar cl learned counsel appearing on the other side also submits the r;, Lmr:.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petifions, per dirrg if trny, shall
stand closed.
SD/- A. I ,REENIVASA REODY ASS ISTANT REGIS 'i--*.-//TRUE COPY// 'SECTION OFFICER
To,
.TPK/ABK
HIGH COURT
DATED:1411012025
COMMON ORDER
CRP.No.197 of 2021 AND
HES
/.,'<a'-.{ i rRi
;i+
o)
C)
,- 2t t(E
t<
. :,S,)ATCI-I
CRP.No.121 of 2021
CIUL REVISION PETITIONS AFI= DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
u
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. A. Alivelamma
Sri. A. Venkatram Reddy
Sri. A. Venkateswar Reddy
Smt. C. Rajitha Reddy
Smt. V. Kousayla Devi
Mahender Agarwal
Narsing Rao Nandikonda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
