Plaintiff challenged a common docket order permitting recall of the Mandal Surveyor witness only for marking coordinates, not for cross-examination on alleged inverse longitude/latitude values. The High Court granted liberty to file fresh applications before the trial court and disposed of the revisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:zl41 OF 2025 & 476 OF 2025
CRP NO.'141 OF 2025:
Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Common Docket Order dated 23.12.2024 passed LA.NO.695 OF 2024 in O.S.NO. 40 OF 2017 on the file of the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, at Bodhan.
Between:
M. Sayeeswari,, Wo.Laxman Rao, Aged about 67 years, Occ.. House wife, R/o.Rakasipet, Bodhan Town, Nizamabad District
.... Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
.... Respondents/Defendants
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.40 ol 2017 on the file of Senior Civil Judge At Bodhan, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition and pass, Pending disposal of CRP 441 ot 2025, on the file of the HighCourt.
a
The petition/Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI Advocate for thepetition6(s), Advocate and the Court made the
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:476 OF 2025:
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Common Docket Order daled 23122024 passed 1.A.NO.695 OF 2024 in O.S.NO. 40 OF 2017 on the file of the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, at Bodhan.
Between:
M. Sayeeswari, W/o. Laxman Rao, Aged about 67 years, Occ. House wife, R/o.Rakasipet, Bodhan Town, Nizamabad District.
Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
.... Respondents/Defendants
The petition/Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI Advocate for the Petitione(s), Advocate for the Respondent(s) and the Court made the following.
ORDER
,.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN.TUKARAMJI CIVIL REVI SION PETITIO NN os. 441 AND 476 0F 2025
COMMON ORDER
Heard tVlr.srinivas Velagapudi. learned counsel for the revision petitioner/plaintiff . ln spite of service ofnotice,the respondents/defendants choose to remain silent.
2
,\ / t(./ (-.ll./).\ar.lll c 1176 al ll)2t
a
ot 2024, C.R.p. No.441 of 2ozs and qg2in5t the order in I A.No.696 of 2024, C.R.P No 476 af 2O2S have been filed.
t I
7
<sup>.tit. /
3
(-lt./).,\a,.71l ltn.l 1,6 ol )02t
a
t {
limited purpose of marking of documents. He further pleads that if the coordinates are taken into account, the location would be somewhere in Europe, as such, this aspect would cause prejudice to the case of the revision petitioner/plaintiff , hence, prayed for interference.
I
1
4
\ i lt. /
(..1<.P'.r.'.i] I tnt/ +7t; ol 2t.)2;
$
476 of 2025 aie disposed of. No order as to costs
Pending nriscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed
SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL
t
To,
PI=P-u-l-RE-G-I-sIE4B:-^ //TRUE COPY// , SECTION OFFICER
Psl
t-. h
HIGH COURT
DATED.19t02t2025
ORDER
CRP.No.441 ot 2025 & CRP.NO.476 0F 2025
r 1il s r,( I€
6,(
oo
30,UN lffi
oz
e
1+I
o a
U Hi-'l
b
{8
/ ,/d
DISPOSING THE CRPS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in limiting the recall of the Mandal Surveyor (CW-1) to marking documents only, without cross-examination on the coordinates.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Sayeeswari
Shaik Musheer
Palakurti Satyanarayana
Simhadri Niraja
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
