Ch. Rajanna v. Chakilam Sreenivasulu (died) per Lr Rr- 2 and 3
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for non-prosecution of a civil appeal before the Telangana High Court (Hyderabad), decided 17-02-2025 by Justice N. Tukaramji. Appellant Ch. Rajanna (plaintiff below) was unrepresented throughout, including when the matter was listed 'For Dismissal' on 06.02.2025 and 07.02.2025. Appeal under Section 96 CPC against final decree/order dated 05-06-2000 in I.A.No.215/1987 arising from O.S.No.69/1977 (I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Warangal). Dismissed without costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed. Useful as authority on default dismissal where appellant repeatedly fails to appear despite specific 'For Dismissal' listing. No precedents discussed; no dissent; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution because, despite the matter twice being listed (including under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 07.02.2025), no one represented the appellant, and no costs were awarded.