Mrs T.L.Prameela Vs Mrs Manda Anusha — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

Mrs T.L.Prameela Vs Mrs Manda Anusha — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application seeking modification of the impugned order dated 05.01.2024 in I.A.No.573 of 2022 in G.W.O.P.No.5 of 2022 (Principal Family Court, Secunderabad) based on subsequent events; no costs; pending interlocutory applications closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the order dated 05.01.2024 in I.A.No.573 of 2022 in G.W.O.P.No.5 of 2022, permitting the first respondent to visit the child on every first and third Saturday between 4 p.m. and 5 p.m. in the Family Court visitation room, should be suspended/interfered with under Article 227 (challenge raised in the CRP, which was subsequently withdrawn).

Ratio / Principle

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty prayed for, and with no costs.

Key takeaways

The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate application seeking modification of the impugned order dated 05.01.2024 passed by the Principal Family Court at Secunderabad in I.A.No.573 of 2022 in G.W.O.P.No.5 of 2022, based on the subsequent events; the prayer is allowed.ratio¶25
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, also stand closed.ratio¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition No.420 of 2025 under Article 227 of the Constitution, aggrieved by the order dated 05.01.2024 in I.A.No.573 of 2022 in G.W.O.P.No.5 of 2022 of the Judge, Principal Family Court, City Civil Court at Secunderabad, which permitted the first respondent to visit the child on every first and third Saturday between 4 and 5 p.m. in the Family Court visitation room till disposal of the main case — petition withdrawn at the instance of the petitioner (counsel: Sri G. Ravi Chandran) with liberty to file an appropriate application seeking modification of the impugned order based on subsequent events — Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for; no costs; pending interlocutory applications stand closed. Bench: Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul; decided 14.02.2025.

i lll

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD}

FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH^{DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE THE^{ACTING CHIEFIUSTICE SUIOY PAUL}

Civil Revision I'etition No.420 of 2025

Civil revision filed under^{Arttcle 227 of the Constitution,agg:rievedby the} order dated 05.01.2024 passed^{in I.A.No.573 of 2022 in G.W.O.P.No.Sof 2022 on the} file of the Judge, Principal^{Family Court,CityCivil Court at Secunderabad'}

Between:

Mrs T.L.Prameela,^W /o Gavin^{Reic1, Aged.55 years, Occ. Senior Accountant in SC} Rly R/o Prammeela nilayam^{Plot No.85,H.No.34-4/41} /1,^{Bhataru. colonynear} Airmuguda Railway station,^{Sainikpuri, Secunderabad}

...Petitionerr/ Respondent No.1.

AND

Mrs Manda Anusha, W/o^{Sheldon Reid, Aged. 34years, Occ' Housewife,R/o} 11-1-815 Chinthabai, Sitafalmandi,^{Sec und erabad.}

..Respondent/ Petitioner-

Sheldon Reid, S/o Gavid Reid,^{Aged 38 years Occ. employeein USA,R/o} Prammeela nilayam Plot No 85^{H.No.34-4/41,f'1, BLaruni colony near} Ammuguda Railway station^{Sainikpuri, Secunderabad}

(Respt No 2 is not^a necessary^{party to this petition)}

..Respondent/ Respondent^No.2.

IA NO: 1. OF 2025

Petition under section 151^{CPCpraying that in the cilcumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the HighCourtmay be pleasedto} susPEND rhe order^{dated 05/07/2024in IA No 573 ot 2022 in GWOP No 5 of} 2022 by the learned Judge^{Principal Family court Secunderabadto the extent o[} permitiing the first respondent^{herein to visit the child on everyfirst and third} taturdays in between 4^{to 5 PM in the family court visitation room till disposalof} the main case pending^{disposalof the above CRP.}

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{Sri G-Ravi Chandran-}

Counsel for the Respondents:^--

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL

CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON No.42O of 2o25

ORDER:

Sri G.Ravi Chandran, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this petition with the liberty to thr: ps1i1i.r.. ,. hle an a.ppropriate application seeking modific;rtion of the impugned order dated O5.O1.2O24 passed by the principal Family Court at Secunderabad, in I.A.No.5T3 of 2022 in G.rvV.O.p.No.5 of 2022, based on the subsequent events.

The prayer is allowed.

.Acc,rrdingly, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn rvith the liberty prayed for. No costs.

lnterlocutory applications, if any pending, shr,Lll also stand

closed

sd/- P.^{CH, NAGABHUSHAMBA} GISTRAR

//TRUECOPY//

OFFICER

To, 1. The ludge, Principal Family Court' City Civil Crcurt at Secun derabad' 2 d"te% -sii i;.'nr"i cnandran, Advocate [oPUC] 3 Two CD CoPies

TCK/ gh *y

HIGH COURT

DATED:74/02/2025

ORDER

CRP.No.420 of 2025

: ----:-.
( du: S-JA iC
s
o
7
tl
0 4 Af'il 20h
ii
,(
Sp/1':Ct\ eo

Dismissing the C.R.P. as withdrawan without costs.

W