Dismissed

Mrs. Mahera Fatima v. Mr. Salman Mohsin Salam

Telangana HC14 Feb 2025CRP/3868/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to direct the Family Court to expedite trial. The court dismissed the petition because the petitioner's counsel was reluctant to file docket orders despite repeated requests, depriving the court of reasons for any delay.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition was dismissed by reserving liberty to file an appropriate petition with relevant docket orders.

Mrs. Mahera Fatima Vs Mr. Salman Mohsin Salam — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT FIYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL

¶5

Civil Revision Petition No.3868 of 2O24

¶6

Civil revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, seeking direction to the Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad to expedite the trial ir.r F.C.O.P.No.599 of 2022.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mrs. Mahera Fatima, W/o. Salman Mohsin Salam D/o. Mirza Gulam Ahmed, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Presently residing at Khan Residence, Flat No. 301, Grammar Colony, Opp. Sayeed Thermocol and Arts Museum, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad-500 008

¶9

...Petitioner/ Petitioner.

¶10

AND

¶11

Mr. Salman Mohsin Salam, S/o. Ahmed Abdulla Mohsin Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 8-2-602/25, Zehra Nagar Road, Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-SO0 034.

¶12

...Respondent/ Respondent.

¶13

IA NO: 7 OF 2024

¶14

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition., the High Court may be pleased to direct the Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad to dispose of the F.C.O.P. No. 599 of 2022 within time frame preferably in two months pending disposal of the above C.R.P.

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Anupriya

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent: - -

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

¶19

THE IION'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.386a of 2o24

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

M s. .A.nupriya Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner pressed lbr the following reliet-

¶22

"For these and such other grounds will be urged at the tine of hearing that t-his Hon'ble Court may be plearied to allow tt e^().R.P. by directing the Learned Judge, Family Court, City C vi1 Court, at Hyderabad to expedite the Trial in F.C.().P.No.599 of 2022 forthwith and pass such other order or oI ders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ht and proper in ci:cunrstances of the case."

¶23

Tlris Court, on more than one occasion, requested the learned oourrsel for the petitioner to file the docket rrrders so that the Court can gather as to what is the reason for deliry. Sadly, the learned^(:ourrsel for the petitioner is reluctant and n()t ready to frle them. lhus, I find no reason to entertain this civil revision petitiorr.

¶24

A,:cordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed by reserving the liberty to the petitioner to file an appro priate petition along rn.ith th e relevant docket orders. No costs.

¶25

lnterkrcutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand

¶26

ciosed

¶27

*---

¶28

Sd/- V. HARI^PRASAD ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ !).

¶29

SECTION^OFFICER

¶30

To, 1 The Judge,^{FanrityCourt, City Civil Co-ut l-Iyderabad} 2 O"" CCi.^{S'l Arrupriya,Advocate IOPUCI} 3 Trvo CD Copies _:==a ?A

*.d,*l

--.&.-*d

HIGHCOURT

DATED:14/02/Zt 2s

ORDER

CRP.No.3868 of 202.1

I
I
r
't HE S l4
*oR (
(
(
oo f,t AI)i ?|,75 C.,/
l
r)E s F

¶39

Dismissing the C.R.p. ivith,rut costs
qA
j1
\2.,
7

¶40

i.tilli;

Mrs. Mahera Fatima v. Mr. Salman Mohsin Salam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Mahera Fatima v. Mr. Salman Mohsin Salam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ap Gems and Jewellery Park Private Limited Vs People Tech Infracon Private Limited

Gaurav Maheshwari Vs Smt. Afshan Khan @ Ishika Maheshwari

Param Educational Society, Vs Mr. R. Keshya

Sri Ram Karan Singh Vs Sri. Rajan Singh

Nawab Mir Osman Ali Khan, Vs Kamran Mirza

Mrs T.L.Prameela Vs Mrs Manda Anusha