Dismissed

Ak Ramesh Kumar v. Air Force Officers Co-operative Housing Society Limited

Telangana HC21 Nov 2025CRP/4194/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that the Civil Revision Petition was not maintainable Article 227 to set aside the trial court's order in an interim observation application. The petition was dismissed with a direction to dispose of the underlying application within one month.

What did the court decide?

Directing the trial court to dispose of I.A. No. 1869 of 2024 strictly in accordance with law, preferably within one month from the date of receipt of this order.

Ak Ramesh Kumar Vs Air Force Officers Co-operative… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

crvrL ION PETITION NO:41940F 2025

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution^{of lndia, aggrieved by the} Docket Order dated 23.10.2025^{passed in l.A.No. 1869 of 2024 in O.S. No'204 of} 2024, passed by the Hon'ble I Additional^{District Judge Medchal Malkajgiri District} at Malkajgiri.

¶8

Between:

¶9

AK Ramesh Kumar, S/o Late^{Mr. A Kapali,Age: Major, Occ: Retired, Fl/o- Plot} No-70 Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad^{- 500094,}

¶10

...PENNONER/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFFS

¶11

AND

¶12

Air Force Officers Cooperative^{Housing Society Limited, Vayupuri,Sainikpuri,} Secunderabad 500094, Telangana^{Represented by its Secretary}

¶13

Wg Cdr TJ Reddy, S/o. Mr.^{T. Nagi Reddy(Late),} {Se1^8^3-yr-s'-Occ:^Retired, Ry6.^plot No. 63, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri,^{Secunderabad - 500094' Telangana}

¶14

Wg Cdr S. Balakrishna,^{S/o Mr R Subramaniam} (^{ate), Age: 83 yLSr^9^"9:} Re-tired, Rlio. Plot No. 26,^{Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad- 500094'} Telangana

¶15

Mr. K. Sree Kumar, S/o. AVM^{Nair(Late), Age: 63 yrs, Occ: Retired, Fi/o. Plot} No. 46, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri.^{Secunderabad - 500094' Telangana}

¶16

Mrs. Medha Naniwadekar,^{W/o.Mr. Vishram Naniwadekar,Age: 56 yrs, Occ-} Architect, Rl/o, Plot No.81,^{Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 500094,} Telangana

¶17

Mrs. Ushnal Rao, Wo. Mr.^{Rao (Late), Age: 56 yrs, Rl/o. Plot No. 75,} Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad^{- 500094, Telangana}

¶18

Maj. MN Reddy, S/o.^{Mr. Reddy, Age: 78 yrs, pgc: Retired, R/o. Plot No.55'} Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad^{- 500094, Telangana}

¶19

M/s. Falcon Galleria and Mall^{LLP, Officeat. Plot No- A1, Sy. No. 21,37and} 38 4th Floor, Surabhi Plaza,^{Vikrampuri Colony KarkhanaRoad,} Secunderabad, Telangana^- 500015^{Represented by its Partners}

¶20

Naveen Kumar Surbhi, S/o. Surabhi Bhoom Rao, \ged about 41 Occ: Business, Rl/o. Plot No. 9, Mani Enclave JJ ll rgar Colony, Yapral, Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh - 609087

¶21

10.Spring Avenues Private Limited, Office at: 8-2-293182 F111lcl2, Backside of Apollo Hospitals Road No. 9212, Film Nagar, Jul ilee hills Hyderabad, Telangana - 500033 Represented by Managing Directr>

¶22

1't. Pochendra Shenigarapu, S/o. Ramaswamy Shenig;r apu, Aged about: 57 Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No. 178, Road No.2H Ravi^ll rciety, Mahendra Hills, Secunderabad Telangana- 500026

¶23

1 2. Brig P. Ganesham, S/o. Mr. P, Rama Sharma^(Le t r), Age: 72 yrs, Occ'. Retired, Ri./o. Plot No.^'102, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Securrr erabad - 500094

¶24

Mr. R. Ashok Swaminathan, S/o. Mr. R.S lyer (Late r, Age 56 years Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No. 166, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri Secur derabad - 500094

¶25

14.Mr. K. Kishan Chandra, Occ: Business, Age: 55^ye rrs R7o. Plot No. 49, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri Secunderabad - 500094

¶26

RESPONDENTS/ RESPOT\ I,ENTS/DEFENDANTS

¶27

15.Dr. Pappu, S/o. Late Shri P. Bhyranna, Age: Major, O c: Retired from lndian Army, Rl/o. Plot No: 148, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunde abad - 500094

¶28

l6.Kameswara Rao, S/o. Late Lakshmaiah, Age: Major i cc: Business, Plot No. 36 Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 500094,

¶29

17.Sudi Venkat Reddy, S/o. Suddi Malla Reddy Age: Ma1 rr Occ: Business, RIo. Plot No-27, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 500,1 )4,

¶30

P Ramchandra Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy Age: Major^tl :c: Business, Rl/o. Plot No-160, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 500094,

¶31

Dr (Mrs) P. Brahmari, D/o Late D.S. Rama Rao, Age: l\ ajor, Occ: Doctor, R/o. Plot No-162, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 501)94,

¶32

S K Rao, s/o. Late S V Ramaiah, Age: Major Occ: Relir -.d from Air Force, Rl/o. Plot No-87, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 5001 )4,

¶33

21.A Bhanu Prakash, S/o. A Mallikarjun Rao, Age: Marc-, Occ: Business, Rl/o. Plot No-106, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 501 )94,

¶34

G S Reddy, S/o. Late G Ranga Reddy, Age: Major, occ: Retired Air Force,^r' Rl/o. Plot No-153, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabac 500094,

¶35

Prem Shankar, S/o. Air Cmde V Shankar (Lar ), Age: Major, Occ: Commercial Pilot Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad^. 500094

¶36

Shyamola Khanna, W/o Air CMDE MD Khanna^(L rte), Age-Major, Occ: Professor, R/o. Plot No-82, Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Sectr Cerabad - 500094,

¶37

25.Pimi Mukherjee, W/o Col. Joy Mukliedee(Late), Age: \ ajor. Occ: Homemaker Rl/o. Plot No-1 14,Vayupuri, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad^- 500094,

¶38

26.L Rala krishna reddy, Age: Major, Occ:^{Business,RUc. Plot No - 82, Vayupuri,} Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 500094

¶39

¶40

(Respondent No. 2 to 7 and 11 to 26 are formal^parties to the^present Civil Revision Petition)

¶41

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS

¶42

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶43

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the lnterim Order dated 06.11-2024^passed in l.A. No. 1869 of 2024 in O.S. No.204 of 2024 unlil further orders^pending disposal of the^present revision.

¶44

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Pasham Mohith

¶45

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri. K V Rusheek Reddy

¶46

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 to 10: Sri Sharad Sangi

¶47

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶48

¶49

¶50

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSI IMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITI ONNo.4l94Or2025

¶51

ORAL ORDER:

¶52

Heard Mr.Pasham Mohith, leamed counsel ft,r the petitioner, Mr.K.V.Rusheek Reddy, leamed counsel for resporlent No.1 and Mr.Sharad Sangi, learned counsel for respondent Nc: g to I 0.

¶53

2 According to the petitioner, respondent Nos.jl to 7 and I I to 26 are formal parties to the present revision petition

¶54

Petitioner filed the present Civil Revision )etition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set asitlt the impugned I)ocket Order, dated 23.10.2025 in I.A.No. lgt! o| 2024 in O.S.No.204 of 2024 on the file of the leamed I Adi tional District and Sessions Judge --cumJudge, Additional^'amilv Court, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda, r.r cl cxtend the interim order dated 06.11.2024 passed by the learlt.r trial Court in the said I.A

¶55

)

¶56

Perusal of record would reveal that the petitioner herein and respondent Nos.15 to 26 have filed the said suit in O.S.No.204 of 2024 against respondent No.1 and others, to declare the lease deed bearing Document No.465 of 2018, dated20.01.2018 and to declare the rectification deed bearing Document No.3828 of 2019, dated 16.05.2019, as null and void, and also for perpetual injunction against the respondents/defendants from interfering with the suit schedule properry in any manner and for payment of damages to the petitioner and others.

¶57

an Interlocutorv 5. In the said suit, petitioner has filed Application vide I.A.No.1869 of 2024 in O.S.No.204 of 2024 under Order XXXIX, Rules I and 2 of C.P.C. seeking temporary injunction. On 06.11.2024, leamed trial Court granted status quo order that exists as on that date in respect of the suit schedule property tilt 18.11.2024. The said interim order was extended up to 23.10.2025 on which date according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, he could not notice the case in the cause list.

¶58

Thereforg, he could not represent the case when called. Vide Docket

¶59

¶60

¶61

Order, dated 23.10.2025, learned trial Court passec rhe following order:

¶62

"1.A. is pending. No rcpresentation by the coL r ;el lbr the petitioner. For hearing, call on l8.l 1.2025.,,

¶63

6 Thereafter, petitioner has filed a petition vide I A.No. 1336 of 2025 seeking advancement of I.A.No.1869 of Z02A n O.S.No.204 of 2024 liom l8.l 1.2024 to any shortest possible darr . The said LA. was allowed on 04.11.2025. Even then, leamed trial Court did not extcnd thc said stetu.s quo order.

¶64

Duringthe course ofhearing, it is broughtto th, norice ofthis Court that pleadings in I.A.No.l869 of 2024 are corr plete and it is posted to 19.12.2025 lor hearing.

¶65

As discussed supra, petitioner filed the prescnt cvision under Article 227 of constitution of India, to set aside the )ocket order. dated 23.10.2025 in I.A.No.l869 of 2024 in O.S.N: ZO4 ot-2024. The said I.A. is filed underOrderXXXIX, Rules l r.r d 2 of C.p.C. 'Iherefbre, present revision filed by the peti.. )ner is not maintainable. lf he is aggrieved by the said order. he has ro prefer

¶66

an appeal. However, learned counsel fc: the petitioner restricted his relied to a direction to the leamed trial Court to dispose of I.A.No.l869 of 2024, in accordance rvith [aw, as expeditiously as possible.

¶67

In the light of the said subrnission, the fact that the pleadings in I.A.No.l869 of 2024 are complere, rhis Civil Revision petition is disposed of directing leamed I Additional Districr and Sessions Judge -cum- Judge, Additional Familr Court. N{edchal - Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda, ro dispose of LA.l.Jo.lg69 of 2024 in O.S.No.204 of 2024, strictl,,- in accordance r.r,ith law, as expeditiously as possible, preferabl;., w.irhin a period of one (1) month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶68

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no

¶69

order as to costs.

¶70

SD/. AJAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

1' The lAdditionar District and sessions Judge --cum- Judge, Additionar Famiry ^^{9or.!MedchatMatkajsiri Oistriii"i Xr"rrll;r#"-'} ?. 9n.^{CC to sri. pasha'ir} M;hiih;fi;;;6'b"Filct 9. 9n.^{cc to sri. K v Rusnee['iiej,jt;fi;;"Li;} io]uct 1. 9n.^{CC to Sri. SharadSangi,} Ad#;i;ioEuti'^" N" 5. Two CD Copies PSL

(

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 11112025

ORDER

CRP.No.4194 of 2025

IE SIA r€
( C,$
-7
()o 1 ,lAti l026 ()z.
-a
,.s
*
{):
ipA:

¶81

DISPOSING OF THE CRP

¶82

/
j<br>

Ak Ramesh Kumar v. Air Force Officers Co-operative Housing Society Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ak Ramesh Kumar v. Air Force Officers Co-operative Housing Society Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dam.BalaMani Vs Gongalla Kamalamma @ Ramulamma (died)

Pilli Venkata Ramana Vs Pilli Sandeep

Smt. K.Vani Vs Gadeela Janga Reddy

Smt. G.V. Satyavathi Vs Dappu Narasimha

M/s.Variman Global Enterprises Ltd. Vs Sri P. Ravinder

M/s.Variman Global Enterprises Ltd. Vs Sri P. Ravinder