The High Court dismissed a petition for expeditious disposal under Article 227. The court held that since plaintiffs did not seek a restraining order, the defendants could not claim estoppel based on alleged alienation. Thus, no direction for faster disposal was justified.
Petition for expeditious disposal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4097 0F 2025
Petition under Nlicle 227 of constitution of lndia against the docket order dated 23-03-2022 passed in OS.No.279 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medchal-lValkajgiri District at Kushiguda.
Between:
,E wife, R/o. H. No.5-4-96, Near HanumanTemple, Yapral. Dara.VenkatReddy, S/o. Late D.SathiReddy, Age: 50 years, Occ: Driver, R/o.H. No.5-4-96, Near HanumanTemple, Yapral.
...AppELLANTS/DEFENDANTS [1 -3,6_8J
ANO
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cotrrr may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS.NO.279I2012 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPLE DISTRICT ANd SESSIONS JUDGE, IMEDCHAL MALKAJGIRI AT KUSHAIGUDA pending disposal of civil revision petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Order 39 Rule'l & 2 CPC praying thal ir the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to grant Ad-interim injunction not to alienate the sctte,dule mentioned suit property and not to create gift or mortgage any type of settlement deeds till disposal of suit for partition on the file of PRINCIPLE DISTI CT and SESSIONS JUDGE. IUEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI AT KUSHAIGUDA in OS NO 279/2017.
SCHEDULE OF THE PROPERTY
All that the agricultural Iand in Sy.Nos.102 extent l.22gts, Sy.No.'1 03/B extent Ac.1.00gts and 120/B extent Ac.2.35 gts, total extent Ac.4 17gts, situated at Yapral Village, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ir4edchal District lormerly known as Rangareddy district is bounded by:
| North | Jawharnagar villageboundary |
|---|---|
| South | Agriculturalland in PartSy.No.103,119,20&125 |
| East | Jawharnagar Village boundary |
| West | Agriculturalland in PartSy.No.103,'119,20&125 |
'i:-{
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri B. Devadas
Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
. r"4:+3?sf ' : ri
HON'BLE S RI JTJSTTCEK. LAKSHM-\
CI Vll, ItEVISION PETITIONNo.4097OI -_2025
OITI)},R:
Ileard Sri tl. [)cvaclas, lcamed counselfor the pt-titioncrs.
f . l'his rcr ision is llled under Article227 of tl.r,-' ( onstitutionol-
Incliir seeking a dircction tothe Principal District & lit:ssions -ludgc' Mcdchal l\4alkajgiri District, atKushaiguda.todisposc of O.S.No.279 o1' 2017 in accordancewith law as expeditiously as possi[-'lg.
3.'l'hc pctitioners herein are defendantsNos. .land 6 to tl. Rcspondent Nos.l to 5 herein filedthe aforesaid r;trit a-eainst tlte petitioners and rcspondeut Nos.6 to l8 forperpetualinjturctior-rand scpalatc possessit'rn of thcsr.rit scheduleproperty'Thc s rid sLritpostcd lbl rrial'l hc pctitioners filed thepresentpetitionseeling e>:pcditious disposal o1'the said suit contendingthat during pend,:rcr' ,rf the said suit. respondent Nos.6 to 1S/defendantsin the said sr it are disposing of tlre suit schcclulepropefty. They have already dispc,sedof part ol the suit schedtrlc propefty.Therefore, they are seekilga direction ttr the trial Court kr disposc ofthe aforesaidsuit in accorclancervith lau' as cxpeditiously as possible.
c61
2
revision fails. It is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this revision shall stand closed.
SD/.cH NDRASEKHAR RAO DEPUTYREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
to'', . -n" Principal District & Sessions Judge' Medchal-MalkalgiriDistrictat Kushiguda' , b;;'ic1;Sri B Devadas' AdvocatetoPucl AM.3 Two CD CoPies EZ Kam,PSL
I tl
HIGH COURT
!
DATED:1411112025
ORDER
CRP.No.4097 ot 2025
14:
/' 4 F l tlE SIA
(
Uo 2 5 t{0lt zui Pz
a
\ TCq(.4+t
DISMISSING OF THE CRP
1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can issue a direction under Article 227 for expeditious disposal of the underlying suit due to alleged alienation of property containing merit.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to relief for requesting faster disposal instead of claiming benefit of doctrine of lis pendens.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dara.BalaMani
Dara.Sudhakar Reddy
Dara Rajendar Reddy
Dara.Shankaramma
Dara.VenkatReddy
Dara.RamReddy
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
