Dismissed¶54

R Sudhakar Rao v. Sports Authority of Telangana State

Telangana HC16 Oct 2025CRP/2859/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

R. Sudhakar Rao v. Sports Authority of Telangana State & The Estate Officer, Sports Authority of Telangana State; CRP Nos. 2859 & 2860 of 2018; Article 227 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; Section 148 r/w 151 CPC; Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad; I.A.Nos. 1058/2018 & 1265/2018 in CMA Nos. 241/2018 & 231/2018; Lal Bahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh; dismissal as infructuous; no merits adjudicated; deposit/time-extension interlocutory applications; Telangana High Court, order dated 16-10-2025.

What did the court decide?

None; both civil revision petitions dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. ¶54

R Sudhakar Rao Vs Sports Authority of Telangana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³⁴⁴³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION N O:2859 & 2860 OF 2018

¶7

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2859 of 2018:

¶8

Petition filed under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia against the Order dated 20-03-20'18 Passed in 1.A.No.105812018 in CMA No.2412018 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶9

Between :

¶10

R.Sudhakar Rao ,^S/o.late Sri^{Thimmaji Raoaged about80 years} Occupation Bussiness Rl/o 104 Raghavendra Thimmaji palace 1-1 -652 Gandhi Nagar Hyderabad

¶11

...Petitioner/Petitioner

¶12

AND

¶13

1 Sports Authority ofTelangana State, Lal Bahadur Stadium Basheerbagh Hyderabad hyd

¶14

2 The Estate Officer, Spods Authority of Telangana State, Lal Bahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶15

...Respondents/Respondents

¶16

lA NO:^'l OF 2018 :

¶17

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 20-3-2018 passed in 1.A No.105812018 in CMA No 24lm1\ on the file of Chief Judge City Civil Court Hyderabad Pending Disposal of CRP.

¶18

lA NO: 2 OF 2018 :

¶19

Petition under Seclion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend two months time to deposite the amount as ordered by the court on 02.05.2018 in C.R.P.No.2859/2018 on the file of this Court, pending disposal of the C.R.P.

lA NO: 3 OF 20'18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the time for deposing the amount ordered by the coud in the interim orders granted on 0210512O18 in CRP.NO.2859/2018 on the file of the court until further orders pending disposal of the above CRP.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri S.Ashok Anand Kumar

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.1

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr.G.Satish Reddy

¶27

clvlL REVISION PETITION NO: 2860 OF 2018 :

¶28

Petition Under Arlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia against the Order dated 20-03-2018 Passed in lA.No 1265/2018 in CMA No.23l2018, on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶29

Between :

¶30

R.Sudhakar Rao, S/o.Late Sri Timmaji Rao, Aged about 80 years, Occupation. Business, R/o^'104, Raghavendra Thimmaji Palace, 1-1-652, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad

¶31

...Petitioner/Petitioner

¶32

AND

¶33

1 Sports Authority of Telangana State, Lal Bahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶34

2 The Estate Officer, Sports Authority of Telangana State, Lal Bahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶35

...Respondents/Respondents

¶36

lA NO: I OF 2018 :

¶37

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 20-03-2018 passed in LA.No.1265/2018 in CMA No. 2312018 on the file of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, pending disposat of the CRP.

lA NO: 2 OF 2018

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend tlvo months time to deposit the amount as ordered by this Hon'ble Court on 01.05.2018 in C.R.P.No.2860 of 2018 on the file of this Hon'ble Court,^pending disposal of the CRP.

¶42

lA NO: 3 OF 2018

¶43

Petition under Section 148 R/w 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time for deposing the amount ordered by this Hon'ble court in the interim orders granted on 01-05-2018 in C.R.P.No.286012018 on the file of this Hon'ble Court, until further orders, peMing disposal of the CRP.

¶44

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri S.Ashok Anand Kumar

¶45

Counsel for the Respondent No.1

¶46

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr.G.Satish Reddy

¶47

The Court made the following

: COMMON ORoER

I / 1,

HON'BLE SRJ JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CTVIL REVISION PETITI ON Nos.2859 &,2A60 of 2018

¶52

COMMON ORDER:

¶53

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. E. Goutham, lean-ned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S. Ashok Anand Kumar, Iearned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the present revision petitions does not survive for adjudication and the civil revision petitions have become infructuous.

¶54

Recording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, these civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶55

¶56

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed

¶57

SD/-A H S GOWRI SHANKAR ANT REGISTRAR

¶58

//TRUE COPY//

¶59

SECTION OFFICER

¶60

To, 't. The Chief Judge City Civil Court Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Sri S.Ashok Anand Kumar,^Advocate [OPUC] r -^{3. One CC to Sri Mr.G.Satish Reddy,Advocate[OPUC]} Aill_^{4. Two CD Copres} l,Svs/ABK

HIGH COURT

DATED:1611012025

COMMON ORDER

CRP.Nos.2859&2860 of 201 8

¶65

I
. Tlitr S ,.i
t
<br>I
I ? 4 JAtl 2826 Ii
,J
I

¶66

DISMISSING THE BOTH THE CRPs AS INFRUCTUOUS