Allowed
Gangu Krishna Murthy v. Chowdavaram Suryakantham (died)
Telangana HCCRP/575/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Three civil revision petitions challenged trial court orders refusing impleadment of pendente lite purchasers in O.S. No.11 of 2015. Holding such purchasers necessary parties whose impleadment should be allowed, the High Court set aside all three impugned orders, permitted the plaintiffs to implead the proposed defendants, and directed expeditious disposal of the suit.
What did the court decide?
Impugned orders dated 03.11.2017 set aside; I.A.Nos.68, 80 and 57 of 2015 allowed; petitioners permitted to implead respective proposed respondents as defendants in O.S.No.11 of 2015; no costs.