Dismissed¶30

Mirza Mohammed Hussain Baig v. Mr. Mohammed Shujuddin

Telangana HC16 Oct 2025CRP/1536/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; CRP No. 1536 of 2021; Article 227 of the Constitution; civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; extension of interim orders; I.A. No. 294 of 2021 in I.A. No. 171 of 2021 in O.S. No. 315 of 2021; VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad; Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation as Defendant No. 1; Section 151 CPC suspension/stay applications closed; no order as to costs; Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda; 16-10-2025.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the civil revision petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, were directed to stand closed as a sequel (paras 31-32). ¶30

Mirza Mohammed Hussain Baig Vs Mr. Mohammed… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶30

Issue for consideration

Whether the civil revision petition challenging the order dated 24.09.2021 (extension of interim orders in I.A. No. 171 of 2021 in O.S. No. 315 of 2021) remained live for adjudication, its cause having allegedly ceased to survive.

¶29

Court's answer

Recording learned counsel for the petitioner's submission that the cause of the present revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the petition has become infructuous, this Court dismissed the civil revision petition as infructuous and made no order as to costs.

¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, Hon'ble Sri Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda, Civil Revision Petition No. 1536 of 2021 under Article 227 of the Constitution, decided 16 October 2025. The petition assailed the order dated 24.09.2021 passed in I.A. No. 294 of 2021 in I.A. No. 171 of 2021 in O.S. No. 315 of 2021 (VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad), whereby the interim orders issued under I.A. No. 171 of 2021 were extended; accompanying Section 151 CPC applications (I.A. Nos. 1-3 of 2021) sought suspension/stay of that order pending the C.R.P. At hearing, counsel for the petitioner (Sri Asad Hussain; no counsel appeared for the respondents) submitted that the cause of the revision petition no longer survived for adjudication and the petition had become infructuous. Recording that submission, the Court dismissed the civil revision petition as infructuous, made no order as to costs, and closed pending miscellaneous petitions as a sequel. No question on the merits of the interim orders was adjudicated and no precedent was cited. Caption styling: Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2, Respondent No. 3 (Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation) is Defendant No. 1, and the petitioner is styled Proposed Respondent No. 2.

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA}

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1536^{OF 202'l}

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution^{of lndia, aggrieved to the order} dated 24.09.202'l^passed in l.A No.^{294ot 2021 in l.A No. 171 of 2021 in O'Sno.} 315 of 2021 , on the file of the^{Vll Senior Civil Judge,City Civil Court, Hyderabad.}

¶8

Between

¶9

Mirza Mohammed Hussain^{Baig, S/o.MirzaAhmed Baig, Aged about 46} years, Occ. Treasurer, Moghal Education Society, R/o. Flat No.^{104, Mass} iowers, Farah Colony, Saidabad,^Hyderabad.

¶10

... Petitioner/Proposed Respondent^No.2

¶11

AND

¶12

'1. Mr. Mohammed Shu,iuddin, S/o. Mohammed Waliuddin, Aged 37 Yrs, Occ' Business, R/o H.no. iB-8-229129,^{Riyasathn Hyderabad.}

¶13

Mr. Mohammed lbrahim^{Aiiaz, S/o Late AhmedHussain,Aged 51 Yrs, Occ'} Bussiness, R/o H.no.^{17 -8-247 l2l A, Yakutpura, Hyderabad.}

¶14

...Respondent Nos.1 &2/Plaintiff^No.1&2

¶15

The Greater Hyderabad^{Municipal Corporation,Re^p.by.its'C-ommissioneland} Spl Officer, Hdving^{its Head Officeat Municipal Complex,Tank Bund Road'} Hyderabad.

¶16

...Respondent No.3/Defendant^No.1

¶17

lA NO: 1 oF 2021

¶18

Petition under section 151^{CPC prayingthat in {he circumstances statedin} the affidavit filedⁱⁿ support^{of the petition,the High courtmaybe pleasedto} suspend the operation of^{order dated 24t09t2021 for extension of interimordersin} l.A No. 171 oi ZOZ,| in O.S^{No. 315 of 2021 on the file of The Vll Senior Civil} Judge, City Civil Court,^{Hyderabad, duringthe pendency of the present C R'P'}

¶19

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶20

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order dated 24109t2021 in l.A No. 294 o? zozi in l.A No. 171 of 2021 n o.s No. 315 ot 2021 on the fite of rhe Vll Senior civil Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad, during the pendency of the present C.R.p.

¶21

lA NO: 3 OF ?-021

¶22

Petitiorr under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit f led in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the proceedirrgs and orders in l.A No. 171 of 2021 in o.s No. 315 of 2021 on the file of rhe Vll senior civil Judge, city civil court, Hyderabad, during the pendency of the presenl: C.R.P.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitione(s):SRl. Asad Hussain

¶24

Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared

¶25

The Court marJe the following: ORDER

¶26

-------.--------

¶27

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CI.L REVISION PEf,ITION No.1536 of 2O2L

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause ln the present revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the civil revision petition has become infructuous.

¶30

Recording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuouS. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall

¶32

stand closed.

¶33

//TRUE COPY//

¶34

SD/- A SREENIVASA REDDY
SIS{ANT REGIST
ECTION OFFICER

¶35

To, 1. Vll Senior^{CivilJudge, City CivilCourt'Hyderaba} i. il""ctL^{si{t. AsSoHrtiain,Advocate [oPUC]} 3. Two CD^CoPies

¶36

lN/