Civil revision petition arising from a Family Court interim order in an FCOP matter; counsel stated the cause no longer survived for adjudication. Recording that submission, the court dismissed the revision petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
None; petition dismissed as infructuous, no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i I
I I i !
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANO TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOI.'RABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 191 OF 2021
Petition under Article 227 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Allow the C.R.P. by setting aside to the order passed in LA.No. 89 of 2019 in FCOP No. 109 of 2019 dt.31-12-2020 on the file of the Judge, Famity Court at L.B.Nagar.
Between:
Smt. Sarika P. Kulkarni, w/o Praveen Dilip Kulkarni, aged about 40 years, occ Housewife rb H.No. 3-124011, Ganesh Nagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad.
Petitione(Respondent)
AND
Praveen Dilip Kulkarni, s/o Dil[r Kulkarni aged about 41 years, occ Private Service rlo H.No. 3-13-1/6, Srinivasapuram Colony, (Ramanthapur, Hyderabad.
Respondent(Petitioner)
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Sect'ron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed in l.A.No.8g of 201 9 in FCOP No. 109 of 2019 dt.31-122020 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the C.R.P., in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitione(s):SRl. Goundla Venkat
Counsel for the Respondents: Kasi Somayajula Jayashree
The Court made the fullowing: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO I ANDIKONDA C[VIL REVISION PEf,ITION No.191 rf 2o2L
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearin3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in th,: present revision petitiorr does not survive ior adjudication ar d tire sanre has become infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, per ding if any, shall
L
stahci cioseci
i. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASTi STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\ ,SECTIONOFFICER
To,
Yk
llil
!i I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:171'1012025
ORDER
CRP.No.191 of 2021
'l HE SIA
( ) (
7
oo I I jAt'l 2026 za,)
..?
'i 7.'
i .,.
CIVIL REVISION PETITIONIS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOI I:
6.4u4 &e
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Sarika P. Kulkarni
Praveen Dilip Kulkarni
Narsing Rao Nandikonda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
