Dismissed¶30

Raj Kumar Gande v. M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.,and 2 others

Telangana HC11 Feb 2025CRP/1498/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition No.1498 of 2019; CRP dismissed as infructuous; execution petition closed by trial Court; E.P.No.137 of 2018; Arb. Case No.1501 of 2014; Principal District Judge, Karimnagar; Article 227 of the Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC petition for receipt of additional material paper; Raj Kumar Gande; Shrira.T City Union Finance Ltd.; Karimnagar; no costs; decided 11.02.2025; bench Abhinand Kumar Shavili and Tirumala Devi Eada.

What did the court decide?

Acting in view of the submission that, the execution petition having been closed by the trial Court, the cause in the revision did not survive for adjudication, the Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous and made no order as to costs. ¶30

Raj Kumar Gande Vs M/s.Shriram City Union Finance… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶5

Civil Revision Petition No.1498 of 2019

¶6

Civil revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrievecl by the order dated 10.04.2019 passed in E.P.No.137 of 201,8 in Arb. Case No.1501 of 2014 on the filc of the Principal District Judge, Karimnagar.

¶7

Iletween:

¶8

Raj Kumar Gande, S/o.Mallaiah, Agec'l 47 years, Occ SGT Teacher, R/o.H.No.4-23, Chamanpally, Mandal and District Karimangar.

¶9

...Petitioner/J.Dr.No.3.

¶10

AN, I Mr/s.Shrira.T City Union Finance Ltd., Karimr-ragar-lI Brarrch, rep. by its Authorized Signatory and Power of Attorney Flolder Mr.A.Mall-ikhiryurl S/o.Srinivas, Aged 36 years, R/o.Karirnnagar.

¶11

..Respondent/D.Hr.

¶12

1. Velpula Bhoopathi, S/o.Veeraiah, Aged 49 years, Occ Business, R/o.H.No.4-19,

¶13

^{VillageChammanpally Manclaland DistrictKarimnagar.}

¶14

3 Sulya Prakash Rao Velpula, S/o.f iruparhi Rao, AgcdZ6 years, Occ MPHE,

¶15

_^{I I No.6-l -124, Y avilapally Mandal ancl DistrictKarimnagar.}

¶16

(Resp.No.2 and 3 are not necessary parties to this case)

¶17

...Rcspondents/J.Drs. No.2 & 3.

¶18

IA NO: 2OF 2079

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC pral,ing that in the circumstances statecl in the affidavit filed in support of the pctition, thc High Court may be pleased to receive the additional material paper in CRP No.1498 of 2019, in rhe interest of Justice.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.Shravan Kumar Goucl.

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri N.srikanth Coutl

¶22

fhe Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

¶24

atj-_ix:r''.

¶25

IION'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SMTJUSTICE TIRUMAIA DE'VI EADA

¶26

C. .P.No. 498 of2019

¶27

RDE (Prr I lttt'b/t .'ri Jattte .,lblutanl Ktont .-ltrt,i/i)

¶28

\flhen the mamer is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel appearing for the respondenrs had rnformed ths C-oun that since the EP itself was closed by the trial Court, the cause in this revision does nor survive for acljudication.

¶29

In vieu, of the said submission, the Civil Revision

¶30

Petition is drsmissed as infmcruous. No cosrs.

¶31

Miscellaneous petitions, { any, pending shall stand

¶32

closed.

¶33

Sd/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

/IIRUECOPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

The PrincipaI District Judge, Karimnagar. 2. One CC to Sri I'.Shravan Kumar Goud, Advocate [OpUC] -lOne CC to Sri N.Srikanth Goud, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies

]CK/ PSI f+

HIGI{ COURI'

DATED-17/02/202s

ORDIlR

CRI'.No. 1498 of 2019

¶44