Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in CC No. 46 of 2019 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Counsel submitted the issues were settled out of court and the cause did not survive. The Court recorded the submission and dismissed the criminal petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8351 OF 2019
Between:
...PETTTTONERS/ACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No. 46 of 201 9 on the fie of the Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally and pass.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in connection with CC No. 46 of 2019 on the file of the Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally and pass.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Karkpalem Advocate representing Sri NAGESHWARA RAO PAPPU, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and none appeared for the Respondent No.'1 .
The Court made the following: OROER
tE-raal.-
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINALPETITION No.8351 0F 2019
ORDER:
Mr.NaumeneSuraparajKarlapalem,learnedcounsel representinglearned counsel for the petitioners would submit that theissLtes between the partieshave been settled out of the Courtand, therefore, the cause in tl-re criminal
petition doesnot survivefor adjudication'
stand closed.
SD/ L.VIJAYALAXMI ASSISI'ANTREGISTRAR
\
i/TRUECOPY//
SF.CTIONOFFICER
To,
'1 . The Xll Additional MetropolitanMagistrate-' Cyberabad at Kukatpally ,. il;'Sio,PoliceStation, KPHB Colony'KukatpallyHyderabad- i. i*"CC. i" tne puBr-rc bROSECUTOR, High Courtto the Stateof Telangana,Hyderabad(OUT)
rpk/eh Vn-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0510312025
oF T€r
.,t.
'o
/:" a .t$ i
it v
l
l: l-)
l"t. s
i; s' C
,l/<." //
'1rr I t +
ORDER
CRLP.No.8351 of 2019
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED
(p- q4 q e) @
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings in CC No. 46 of 2019 should be quashed given the parties' out-of-court settlement?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Sri Raghava Constructions Ltd
Anne Venkateswara Rao
Chalasani Vara Prasad
State of Telangana
K.Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
