Quash petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. concerning Crime No.195 of 2016; counsel conceded it was infructuous as the case ended in uncontested acquittal before the Judicial Magistrate, Chewela. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5415 OF 2018
Between:
Vemula Venkatesh, Occ.Business, R/o.H.No.4-5, Kismathpur, Rajendra Nagar,Ranga Reddy District, Telangana state.
.....PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO 1
AND
.....RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash all proceeding in CC.No.206 o'f 2017 in Crime No.172 of 2016 dated 29-10-2016 of P.S. Shankerpally,R.R. District,Telangana state pending on the file of judicial First class Magistrate at Chewela.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.206 ot 2017 in crime No.172 of 2016 dated 29-'10-2016 of P.S. shankerpally R.R. District Telangana state pending on the file of judicial First class Magistrate at Chewela R.R.District Telangana state against the petitioners/Accused including arrest and personal appearance.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V NAGESWARA RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
it
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.5862 of 2018
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.p.C. seeking to quash the proceedings in in Crime No.195 of 201,6 dated 19.11.2016 on the fite of the Police Station Shankerpally, Ranga Reddy District.
II
respondent-State would submit that the case was disposed of in C.C.No.425 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of
2
First Class, Chewela and the nature of disposal was Uncontested-
Acquittal. To substantiate the same, leamed counsel filed online
copy of the e-court proceedings.
the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutorappearing AS for respondent-State, this criminal petition isdismissed
infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thiscriminal
petition, shall stand closed.
Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
VA-
I
HIGH COURT DATED:,2810212025
ORDER CRLP.No.S415 ot 2018
,,, q.O 11 THE g r4
.J'
it
!: ()
t{\r
0i uu
!o n25
-+
* ,o
P4tc
DISSMISSING THE CRIMINAL
PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS tl;2b l-l
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quash petition survives when the underlying case has ended in acquittal?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vemula Venkatesh
State of Telangana
Sri Vajja Srinivasa Rao
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
