Dismissed¶24

Gadhe Thomas Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC28 Feb 2025CRLP/7477/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; Justice K. Surender; Criminal Petition No. 7477 of 2019; dated 28.02.2025; Gade Thomas Reddy; Kotha Raji Reddy; accused Nos. 3 and 4; P. Vijitha complainant; State of Telangana; PRC No. 105 of 2018; VI Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Warangal; Section 482 Cr.P.C. quash petition; case committed to Sessions Court; cause does not survive; dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed; Bathula Raj Kiran Advocate; M. Vivekananda Reddy Assistant Public Prosecutor.

What did the court decide?

Since the case has already been committed to the Sessions Court by the learned Magistrate, the cause in the quash petition does not survive for adjudication. ¶23

Gadhe Thomas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:.7477 OF 2019

¶6

Between:

¶7

Gade Thomas Reddy, S/o Prakesh Reddy, Age:63 years Occ: Business, R/o H.No. 1-7-17911, Revenue Colony. Hanumakonda, Warangal District.

¶8

2 Kotha Raji Reddy, S/o Narasimha Reddy, Age 44 yearc Occ: Govt. Employee, R/o H.No. 2-958414, lndira Nagar, Wadepally, Hanumakonda.

¶9

...PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO 3 & 4

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶12

P.Vijitha Wo Yadagiri, Age. 40 years, Occ Pvt. Teacher, Rlo 24-3-10117, Prakashreddypet, Hanumakonda.

¶13

...RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in PRC No. 105 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Vl Additional Judicial lVlagistrate of First Class, Warangal against the accusedno3&4.

¶15

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Bathula Raj Kiran, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy, Assistant Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad on behalf of the State and none appeared for Respondent No.2.

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶18

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7477 OF 2019

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash proceedings in PRC.No.1O5 of 2018, on the file of IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Warangal.

¶21

Heard the leaned counsel for the petitioners and Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent State.

¶22

The case was at the stage of PRC and the same has been committed to Sessions Court by the learned Magistrate.

¶23

Since the case has been already committed to Sessions Court by the letrrned Magistrate, the cause in th e present case does not survive for adjudication.

¶24