Disposed

Badavath Vinod Kumar Naik v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Feb 2025CRLP/745/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings before the II Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B. Nagar. Counsel confined the prayer to dispensing with the petitioner's personal appearance. The court dispensed attendance subject to conditions and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioner dispensed with, subject to conditions including affidavit and appearance when required.

Badavath Vinod Kumar Naik Vs The State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWo rHousAND AND rwerurv rvi'-'^" " PRESENT

¶2

Between:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMI NAL PETITION NO: 745 0F 2019

¶4

ffi];ffl*H#,[Tffi^{'AXtr"il";fl lll$Hffi *v,f :n&,,3"fl:8trff} xfl Stl:

¶5

AND

¶6

... PETITIONER/ACC USED

¶7

1 ix,s?j!::tsiil;j1i:3it{ffF3rJ,?,i#?[i?ffi .s,:ffi lf, "n*""31#*.{8...,

¶8

2 R31},Ri"#:,ffff :,f $#yBf.?r"*,occstudentNo2-z-27,

¶9

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶10

Petition under Section _4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum ot crouno" ri c..i#iili'p"tition, the Hign court may be preased to ca, for the records in c-c.*o.Isiiiiiiia onthe fire of the court of , l[:[TriiH:.I::J;j'.""^{cvoeraoao,ai G N;;;:"d euash the same} asainst

¶11

I.A. NO:1 oF 2019

¶12

Petition under Section 4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum..of crounds ii c1i#i"li'petition, the High court may be pleased to stav of a, further proce;oi,igr ,.iiiiii g personar appearance of the Petitioner in c.c.No.295slzor8 o;ih;"fi";i il", Metroporitan Masistrate cyberabad, at LB Nagar, pending tne Jisposar Ji tn. aoore criminar petition.

¶13

Grounds This of Petition coming criminar petition on for and hearing, upon perusing upon ' the Memorandum of nearing the arguments of Sri NARAPARAJU AVANEE.H, Advocate for the petitioner and the Asst. pubric Prosecutsr'(TG) on beharf of the Respondent No. 1, and None Appeared for" the Respondent No. 2.

¶14

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶15

¶16

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK.SURENDER}

¶17

CRIMINAL^{PETITION No.745 0F 2019}

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

This Criminal Petition^{is hled by the petitioner/A-lto} quash the proceedings^{in C.C.No.2953 of 2018 pending on the} fite of II Metropolitan^{Magistrate, L'B'Nagar,Cyllerabad} District.

¶20

Heard learned counsel^{for thepetitiont:rand} Sri M.Vivekananda^{Reddy, learnedAssistantPublic} Prosecutor for the^respondent -^{State. Perusedthe rec:ord'}

¶21

Learnecl counsel for the^{petitioner confined his prayerto} dispense witl:r his^{personal appearance'}

¶22

Considering the submission of learned^{counselfor the} petitioner, the attendance of petitioner herein^{is dispensed} with, with the following conditions:

¶23

i) Petitioner shall always be represented by the^counsel on record.

¶24

,ⁱⁱ⁾ He shall file an aJfidavit stating that in his absence, the proceedings conducted by the counsel will not be disputed by him in any manner and shall not dispute his identity also.

¶25

iii) He shall appear before the learned M2gistrate as and when his presence is required. In the event of tJre petitioner failure to appear when the Court directs, this order dispensing his attendance shall stand cancelled.

¶26

5' Accordingly, the criminar petition is disposed off. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶27

¶28

Sd/- K AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFF]CER

To,

The ll Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad, at LB Nagar.

¶33

The station House fficer, L.B.Nagar police station, Rachakonda District.

¶34

One CC to SRl. NARAPARAJU AVANEESH, Advocate tOpUCI

¶35

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶36

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

l
t
I

DATED:^12t0212025

ORDER

CRLP.No.745 ot 2019

:=
1Yr E Slni{ aA
( (.)
c
cof 1 7 \pR ?tiz5 ,\o
.ri
*
t
.11-. r':'i jA(

¶44

THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OFF
I
t A
)- i
? "l

Badavath Vinod Kumar Naik v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badavath Vinod Kumar Naik v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp Vs Mohd Adbdul Rayees and 4 Others

Rajasekhar Addaguduru Vs M/s Sunwatt International Private Limited

Komalla Sridhar Vs The State of Telangana and another

P. Krishna Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Devarajam Vuppula Vs The State of Telangana

Y.Sasidhar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another