Disposed

Y.Sasidhar Reddy v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC12 Feb 2025CRLP/3911/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to quash proceedings in C.C.No.394 of 2016; counsel confined prayer to dispensing with personal appearance of accused No.2, a doctor. Court dispensed attendance subject to counsel representation, affidavit, and appearance when required; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioner/A-2 in C.C.No.394 of 2016 dispensed with under stated conditions; petition disposed, pending applications closed.

Y.Sasidhar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3911 OF 2019

¶6

Between:

¶7

Y.sasidhar Reddy, S/o Late Janardhan Reddy, Aged about 45^years, Occ.^Business R/o H.No. 3-1 18/16, Bheemreddy Nagar, Boduppal, Ghatkesaar Mandal^Ranga Reddy District.

¶8

... PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

'1 . The State of Telangana and Another, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶11

G.Seetharam Reddy, S/o Narsimha Reddy^{Aged about 46 years, Occ-Pvt.} Employee, Rio H.No. 9-OBl1Ol2lC, East Hanuman^{Nagar,Boduppal,} Hyderabad.

¶12

..,RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^{Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to call for the records relating to C.C.NO.^{394 OF 2016 on the file of} the Court of Xlll Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad^{at LB Nagar, and quash the} same against the^peiitioner /A.2.

¶14

l.A. NO: 1OF 2019

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to stay of all further^{proceedingsincluding appearance of the} petitioner C.C.NO. 394 OF 2016 on the file of the^Court of^{Xlll Metropolitan} Magistrate, Cyberabad at LB Nagar,^{pending disposalof the above Crl P-}

¶16

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirninal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J. Kanakaiah, A.dvocate for the Petitioner and Sri lvl. Vivexanada Reddy, Assistant Public P.osecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2-

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

t I

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.3911 OF 2019

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Criminal Petition is liled by the petitioner/A-2^to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.394 of²⁰¹⁶ pending on the file of XIII Metropolitan Magistrate^at Cyberabad at L.N.Nagar

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the^{petitioner ald} Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy, learned^{Assistant Public} Prosecutor for the respondent - State.^{Perusedthe record.}

¶25

After arguing for some time, learned^{counselfor the} petitioner confines his prayer to dispense with the^personal appearance of petitioner herein- Accused^{No.2 in the Court} below since he is a Doctor.

¶26

I I

¶27

Considering the submission of learned^{counselfor the} petitioner, the attendance of petitioner herein is^dispensed with, with the following conditions:

¶28

i) Petitioner herein shal1 always be represented^{by his} counsel on record.

j . - ,i

ii) He,shal1 file an affidavit stating that in his zrbsence, the proceedings conducted by his counsel will not be disputed by him in any rnanner and shall not dispute his identity also.

¶33

iii) He sha11 appea-r before the learned Magistrate as and when his presence is required. In the event of the petitioner,s failure to appear when the Court directs, this order dispensing rvith his attendance shali stand cancell:d.

¶34

Accc,rdingly, the Criminal petition is dir;posed off. Miscellanr:ous applications pending, if aly, shall stand closed.

¶35

To,

¶36

sd/- N. sRlHARt ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /1\l'i \J SECTION OFFICER

¶37

The Xlll Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at LB Nagar

¶38

The Statiorr House officer, Ghatkesar police Station, Cyberabad

¶39

One CC to Sri J Kanakaiah Advocate tOpUCl

¶40

Two ccs tc, the Pubric^prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad 'OIJT)

¶41

Two CD cot,ies

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1 210212025

ORDER

.',' . ',''. . ... :.:.
'a.;<br>'lJ
2r 1., I 2825
O't
1,,

¶47

CRLP.No.3911 of 2019

¶48

Disposing of the Criminal petition

¶49

ll q )

Y.Sasidhar Reddy v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.Sasidhar Reddy v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of A.P. Rep., by Its Pp Vs Mohd Adbdul Rayees and 4 Others

Rajasekhar Addaguduru Vs M/s Sunwatt International Private Limited

Komalla Sridhar Vs The State of Telangana and another

P. Krishna Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Devarajam Vuppula Vs The State of Telangana

Badavath Vinod Kumar Naik Vs The State of Telangana