Criminal petition for quashing proceedings was dismissed as infructuous upon the court recording the submission of learned counsel that the matter had become infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions were ordered closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGHCOURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THEFIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMTJUSTICEK. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6614 OF 2017
Between:
" fi;;;"tt, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSEDNos. 2 to 4
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
PetitionunderS-ection4S2ofCr'P'C,prayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition'theHighCourtmay be pleased toquashthe criminalproceedings against the petitionersin c.c.No.185 of2017 in crime No.102of 2',16 pf PS.GDK-|| Town,Peddapalli district, on thefile of the Principle Junior civil Judge'at Godavarikhani' for the offence U/s498-4,506,354(A) IPC & Sec 3 & 4 of DP act'
l.A. NO:1 oF2017(CRLPMP.NO: 6830 OF20171
PetitionunderSection4S2ofCr'P'C,prayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourt
may be pleased to stay all proceedings inctuding atr p€ arance of the Petitioners/Accuse( \o.2 to 4, in C.C.No..l85 ot 2012, in Crinre t\o. 102 of 2016 of PS.'GDK-Il rcw I Pedappali District on the fire of the princ par Junior civir Judge at Godavarikhani' for the offence u/s.4gB-A, 506 354(A) rpc and sec. 3 and 4 of Dp Act
Thrspetition : tmir Grounds or crir z J:;:,t":f ;r;"'[ffi;,T:,::rH:;i:,],.:i V. RAGHUNATH. Ar vocate for the petitioners and tt behatr or the Respor rent No .l and None Appeare. ;,?: ;;;":;"J::l,l? ".
The Court made the t)llowing: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6614 of 2Ol7
ORDER:
l,earned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
the matter has become infructuous.
is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaleous petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed
SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SEC o OFFICER
To,
Pcsd/PSL
HIGH COUR'T
DATED:0510:ll2025
ORDER
GRLP.No.6614 of 2017
t i-i.
"f
!r)
.$
r,,1'
i:
l:; $s<br>.,i
\2.
''-lr:-,;i -
.,,
--: ---=t--z
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUIS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Makala Sravanthi
Makala Kethamma @ Bhavani
Makala Prathap
State of Telangana
Makala Prashanti
Smt. Justice K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
