Govindreddy Bhasker Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^N.TUKARAMJI

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos : 5390 5391 5392 and^{5393OF 2025}

¶6

Crl.petition No. 5390 of 2025:

¶7

Between:

¶8

Govindreddy Bhasker Reddy, S/o.^{LateBuchi Reddy,Aged-about- 32 years.,Occ-} Business,^(lo. n.No. 8-5-12111,^{Durga Nagar, Katedan, RajendranagarMandal,} ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{its Public Prosecutor,HighCourt of} Judicature at Hyderabad for the State^{of Telangana}

¶11

Sri. K. Jagjeevan Reddy, S/o. K.S.^{Reddy,Aged about- 62 years, Occ-} Business, R/o-'H.No- 184-738, Charminar,^Hyderabad.

¶12

..,RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 528 of^{BNSS praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminalPetition, the High court may be} pleased to quash the impugned^proceedings in C.C.No-^{No' 1'125 of 2024 on the} iile of the I Additional Junior^{Civil Judge-cum- Xll AdditionalMetropolitan} Magistrate at Rajendranagar., in so^{far as petitioner / AccusedNo.1 is concerned.}

¶14

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025

¶15

Petition under section 528 of^{BNSSpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of^{Grounds of criminalPetition,the High courtmay be} pleased to grant interim stay of all further^{proceedings includingthe appearance.of} ine^{petitionerlA-1} .in C.C.No.^{No.'l 125 ot 2024 on the file of the I Additional Junior} Civii Judge- curir -Xll Additional^{Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar.} pending disposal of the above Criminal^petition

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing,^{upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of crrminal Petition^{and upon hearingthe arguments of Sri MANCHARLA} VISHNU VARDHAN .AdVOCAIC fOT thE^{PEtitiONETANd STi JITHENDERRAO} VEERAMALLA, Additional^{Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No-1}

¶17

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5391 OF 2025

¶18

Between:

¶19

Govindreddy_ Bherske r Reddy, Sio. Late Buchi Reddy, Aged about 32 years, Occ Business. R/o l- l\c. 8-5-12111 , Durga Nagar. Katedan Rajendranajar Mandal Ranga Reddy [)istri,;. ...pETtTtoNER/AccusED N;.3

¶20

AND

¶21

The_ Stab r;f f elangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor. High Ctourt of Judicature at Hvderabad for the State of Telangana

¶22

Sri. K Jagje,3van Reddy, S/o. K.S. Reddy Aged about. 62 years, Occ. Business, llitr ll. No. 184-738, Charminar, Hyderabad

¶23

...RESPONDENT/I)OMPLAINANT

¶24

Petition rr de rr Section 528 of BNSS praying that irr the: circumstances stated in the Mermc,r: ndum of Grounds of criminal petition, the: Higrh court may be pleased to quas;h the mpugned proceedings in C.C. No. 1132 OF .:,).024, on the file of the I Additiora .l :nior civil Judge-cum-Xll Additional Metropoliti;rn Magistrate at Rajendranagar, irr s: {ar as petitioner/Accused No.3 is concerned

¶25

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025

¶26

Petition rrnde r Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Mernrcrzrrdum of Grounds of criminal petition,the High court may be pleased to grant ink:rim stay of all further proceedings including :he appearince of the Petitioner/r,.- I r c.c. No. I'132 oF 2024, on the fite or rne t Raaiiionat civit Judge-cum-Xll Adciii:nal Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendrangar. pending disposal of the arbo're^(lriminal petition .

¶27

This Petiticn rxrming on for hearing,upon perusing the Mtemorandum of Grounds of crinrinal f)3tition and upon hearing the arguments of Sr MANCHARLA vlsHNU VARDI{r\l'l Advocate for the petitioner and sri J|TI.IENDER RAo, VEERAMALLAA, Arltlitional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the, Rer,;pondent No..1

¶28

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 53920F 2025

¶29

Between:

¶30

Govindreddy Bhaskr-=r t]e_ddy_,, S/o. Late Buchi Reddy, Aged about. 33 years, Occ. Business, R/o. t1.Nc. 8-5-12111 , Durga Nagar, Katedan, Rajendr;rnag'ar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distr ict.

¶31

...PETITIONER/AI:)CUSED No. 1

¶32

AND

¶33

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana

¶34

Sri. Phukraj Bhati, S/o Ramdayal Bhati Aged about.47^years, Occ. Business, Rio. H.No. 14-9-408 to 4 10, Chudi Bazar, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad

¶35

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶36

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{HighCourt may be} pleased to quash the impugned proceedings in CC.No. 646 of 2023 on the file of the Xll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar in so^{far as petitioner/} Accused No.1 is concerned

¶37

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025

¶38

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the^{High Court may be} pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in CC.No. 646 of 2023 on the file of the Xll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate at^{Rajendranagarincluding} appearance and attendance of the^{petitioner/Accused} No.1,^{pendingdisposal of} the above Criminal^petition

¶39

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon^{perusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri MANCHARLA} VISHNU VARDHAN ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri JITHENDER^RAO' VEERAMALLAA, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf^{of the RespondentNo- 1}

¶40

cRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5393 OF 2025

¶41

Between:

¶42

Govindreddy Bhasker Reddy,, S/o . Late Buchi Reddy, Aged about- 32^{years, Occ-} Business, R/o. H.No. 8-5-12111 , Durga Nagar, Katedan, Raiendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 AND

¶43

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public^{Prosecutor,HighCourt of} Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana

¶44

2 Sri. K. Sanjeeva Reddy,, S/o. Anji^{Reddy. Aged about 64 years,Occ-} Business, Fi/o H.No 6-i40, Reddy^{Basthi, ShamshabadMandal, Ranga} ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶45

Reddy Diskict

¶46

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Petition, the High Court may be} pleased to quash the impugned proceedings in C.C. No. 616^{OF 2023, on the file} of the I Additional Junior civil Judge-cum-Xll^{Additional Metropolitan Magistrate. in} so far as petitioner/ Accused No.1 is concerned.

¶47

l.A. NO:2OF ZA2ai

¶48

Petition uncerr Section 528 of BNSS praying that n the circumstances stated in the [,lerro-andum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the Hi,gh Court may be pleased to gr;rnt rrbrim stay of all further proceedings in C.C. No. 616 OF 2023, on the file of the ll\dditional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Xll Additir:nal Metropolitan Magistrate, inclldi-r3 appearance and attendance of the petitionr,rrlAccused No.1, pending disposal rlf tle above Criminal petition.

¶49

This Petiliorr coming on for hearing,upon perusrng rhe lVlemorandum of Grounds of Crrmirr: Petition and upon hearing the arguments of {:iri MANCHARLA VISHNU VARDll,r,N, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri JIIHENDER RAO, VEERAMALLAA r\lditional Public Prosecutor on behalr of the Respondent No. 1.

¶50

The Court made tht: following COMMON ORDER:

¶51

) )

¶52

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI}

¶53

CRIMINAL PE^{TITION Nos.5390. 5391 . 5392 and5393 of 2025}

¶54

coMMON ORDER:

¶55

These Criminal^{Petitions are filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya} Nagarik Suraksha^{Sanhita,2023(for short 'BNSS' 2023')seeking} quashment of the^{proceedings in C.C'Nos'1125,1132 of 2024' 646and} 616 of 2023^{on the file of learnedI AdditionalJunior civil Judge-cum-Xll} Additional Metropolitan^{Magistrate at R'ajendranagar'against the} petitioner/accused No.1.

¶56

Heard Mr,Mancharla^Vishnu Vardhan, learned^couhselfor ,ir Veeramalla,^{learnedAdditional} petitioners and Mr.Jithender^Rao Public Prosecutor^{appearingfor the respondentNo' 1-State'}

¶57

The^{petitioner is arrayed as accusedNo'1 in C'C'Nos'1125' 1132} of 2024,646^{and 616 of 2023,registeredfor the offences under Sections} 323,384,427,447,506^{readwith 34 of lndian Penal Code(for short} 'lPC') in C.C No-1^{125 ot 2024, under Sections427} '⁴⁴⁷ '^{506 read with34} of IPC in C.C^{No.1132 ot 2024' under Sections447' 427read with 34 of} IPC in C.C^{No.646ot 2O23 and under Sections341} '^{447' 427' 504'5Oo} read with 34^{of IPC in C.C No..616ot 2023'}

¶58

4.Learnedcounselforthepetitionerwouldsubmitthatthoughthe petitioner is resolved^{to face the proceedings' his presence beforethe} trial Court on^{each adjournmentis causing severe hardshipand --} effecting his^{employment. Therefore,prayed for dispensing his}

¶59

2

¶60

I i

¶61

person;al t)ro.<;ence unless it is required for the pro,:eerlings and such direction woiJld redress his grievance.

¶62

Leilrrtr:d Additional public prosecutor submits that there is no specific obir-':tion for the prayer, however preaded for a direction for in person presence of the petitioner in the material ,;tages of the proceedings;.

¶63

Har,,ing regard to the submissions, subject to the petitioners, appearance through his counsel on every adjournnrent and the petitioners' l),lrsonal appearance as and when dire<red by the court, the pers;on;al oresence of the petitioner in the procer,rdings of the C.C.Nos 11L5, 1132 of 2024,646 and 616 of 2023 on rhe fite of learned I Additionar Jrrnior civir Judge-cum-X, Additionar Metroporilan Magistrate at Rajendrar zrgar, against the petitioner/accusecl No..l , 15 dispensed with' Additi.,arry it is specified that any lapse rn abidirrg the above conditions^,rruorrld render this order ineffective.

¶64