Dismissed¶28

Sri Rakesh Singh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Mar 2025CRLP/4752/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash C.C.No.2010 of 2018 (XXV Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, Miyapur, Cyberabad) filed by Accused Nos. 1 to 3 against Respondent No.2/defacto complainant; disposed as infructuous upon recorded submission of the Assistant Public Prosecutor that the trial ended in acquittal; petition dismissed as infructuous, miscellaneous petitions closed; Telangana High Court, single bench of Justice K. Surender, dated 10.03.2025; no merits adjudication, no precedent on quashing.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous following acquittal in C.C.No.2010 of 2018, and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed. ¶28

Sri Rakesh Singh Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TEI-ANGANAA'I'I{YDERABAD}

¶2

MONDAY, TI-IE TENI-H^{DAY OF MARCH} TWOTHOUSAND AND TWIIN1Y^FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABI-E SRI JUSTICE^K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PF.-fl'llON NO:^t1.752 OF²⁰²⁰

¶6

Between

¶7

Sri ILakesh Singh, S/o.^{Sri. RaghuvcclSingl,} Aged about 36 Years, Occ.

¶8

SrnL Durgesh Nandini,^{W/o.RagllrveerSingh,} Agcd about. 60^years, Occ.^{Housc M/i[c,}

¶9

Sri. Raghuveer Singh,^{S/o, Latc Sri Rarn LrkshmanSingh,} Agcd about. 6,tr^{ycars, ()cr:-}

¶10

All R/o. H.No. 26-r11i1512, RN.^{35, RalararnNagar,} Near Safilguda Railway Station,^Salilgrda. Malkzrigiri] Hyderaba<i - 5000,172

¶11

...Pe titione r/Accused No^{l kr 3}

¶12

AND

¶13

1.^'I'he State o[ Telangana,^{Rcp.by irs Public Prosecutor,} I-Iigh Court lbr the Statc o[Telangana^{at Hyderabad}

¶14

Smt. Radrod furusha,^{\dt/6.ft2JrcshSingl,} Agcd about. 26 Years, Occ.^Housc\/ile,

¶15

R/o. PIot No. 302, Balaji^Rcsideucl , Bcside.lamcs 7,one, Madhapur-, Scrilingampally,^Hyrleraba<l -^5000r)0

¶16

...Respondent No.2/ Defacto Complairtant

¶17

Pcritiol u1{er Section⁴⁸² of Cr.P.C^{pr:iying th'rL in the circumst:rncesstated in thc} Mcmor:rndum of^(lrounds o1'crirninal^{Pt:tition, thc Highcour.t rnay be plcasedto Quash} procee<lings in C.C.No.2010 ol 2018 on tltc^{lile of the XXV MetropoliranMagistratcal} Kukatpallv. Miyapur.^{('ylrer;rlr:rrl.}

¶18

I.A. NO: 2OF 2020

¶19

Petition uDder Section⁴⁸² ol-Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circunstanccsstatcdin thc} Mcrnorandurn o[ Grounds of crimilal^{Pctition, the Highcourt rnay b9 pleascdto stay all} furthcr procceding! including tltc^{arrcst ol- thc Pe titioncl-s/Accu-si<l Nos' 1 to 3in} C.C.No.2010 of 2018 on the^hle of^{thc XXV Mctropolitan Magistrateat Kukatpally,} Miyapur, C1'berabad.

¶20

¶21

'I-lris Pctilr.. c r'ring.. lbr- lrcar-r.g, upo. perusing thc r\lcrrr, r.:rrrrlurn oJ (]rou.rls of Crirninal PeLrtjlrt ;Lurl trlrotr ltcaring the argnmcnts ol- Sri f L urio6tllrla Srini'as, Advocatc fbr the P.:trti rtrtrs arttl the Public Prosccutor on behalIol rlr: Iesponrlent No.l

¶22

The Court rladr: tlrr lirl ,ii,rinq: ORDER

¶23

i-a'

¶24

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK'SURENDER}

¶25

Crl.P. No.4752 OF 2O2O

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Learned Assistant Public^Prosecutor 9n^instructions submits that the case in^{the Court below has ended in} acquittal, as such, the^{cause in Criminal Petitiondoes not} survive for adjudication^{and has become infructuous'}

¶28

2 Recording the submission^{made by thelearned} Assistant Public Prosecutor, the^{Criminal Petition ls} dismissed as infmctuous.

¶29

Miscelianeous Petitions,^{pending ifarry, shall stand}

¶30

q,-1o_sed.

¶31

¶32

Sd/- MOHD.^ISMAII, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶33

/TI-RUIi]^COPYII

¶34

/t,-SECTION^OFI,'ICER

¶35

To,

¶36

TIre XXV^{Me tropolitatlN{;.rglstratcat Kukatll.rlll ,} -N4.iy;qlur,^{Cyllcrirlta<l} 2.^{()neCCtoSri.l, t'r iPotlrulaSrir rir r'. Ar lr ocattl()PII('l}

¶37