Quash petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash FIR No. 116 of 2020 of Women PS Charminar. The Public Prosecutor reported the parties settled their dispute before Lok Adalat, leaving no cause for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4678 oF 2020
Between:
500084
...PETITIONER No.1 to 3 /ACCUSED No.7 to 9
AND
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in FIR No 116 of 2O2O dated 21tO7 t2O2O on the file of Women PS, Charminar, Hyderabad City.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2O2O
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings lncluding arrest of the Petitioners No'l to 3/Accused No. 7 to 9 in FIR No. 116 of 2O2O dated
2110712020 on the file of Women PS, Charminar,Hyderabad City,pending disposal of the -mainquash proceedings in the interestof justice.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2O2O
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim ordergranted on 06-10-2020in CRLP. No.4678 OF 2020, till the disposal of main case, in the interest ofJustice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SURYA BALU MAHENDRA, Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr M.VivekanandaReddy Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 and Sri Jakkula Sridhar, Advocate for the Respondent No-2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER
CrI.P.No.4678 oF 2020
OR DER:
submissionmade bY the learned 2. Recorclingthe 1S the CriminalPetition AssistantPublic Prosecutor'
dismissedas infructuous'
.) MiscellaneousPetitions, pending if any' shall stand
I
closed SD'- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUWREGISTRAR
,ITRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
RC/ h
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1010312025
ORDER
CRLP.No.4678 ot 2020
.:<br>t\ p STAI 6 -.i:...
ll '+ \r
D\l
)
2 B l'ltfi 2[25 o;
st
t
i.. .! fis5pArC
The Criminal Petition is Dismissed as lnfructuous
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gyan Datt Mishra
Vikas Pandey
The State of Telangana
Nikitha Agarwal
K.Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
