Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

K.Sangayya Math Vs State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Telangana HC
2025
K.Sangayya Math Vs State of TelanganaK.Sangayya Math v. State of Telangana

Dismissed¶27

K.Sangayya Math v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Oct 2025CRLP/3886/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution (13.10.2025) by Justice J Sreenivas Rao, Telangana High Court, of CRLP No. 3886 of 2022 filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by K Sangayya Math (accused; dismissed principal of Dhakhin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha) seeking quashment of FIR No. 17512021 (Saifabad police station, Hyderabad; FIR date OCR-illegible) under IPC Sections 408, 420, 461, 468, 471-A (variant listing: 467). Complainant-side respondent: DBHPS through secretary G. Selvarajan. Petitioner absent on 10.10.2025 and 13.10.2025 listings ('For Dismissal'); miscellaneous applications closed as sequel; merits of quashment not adjudicated; no relief granted. Counsel: V V L Sujatha for petitioner; M. Vivekananda Reddy, Asst. Public Prosecutor (TG), for State of Telangana.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner failed to appear on 10.10.2025 and again on 13.10.2025 (matter relisted under the caption 'For Dismissal'); concluding that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the matter, the Court held it had no option except to dismiss the Criminal Petition for non-prosecution.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the FIR No. 17512021 pending on the file of Saifabad police station, Hyderabad, under Sections 408, 420, 461, 468, 471-A of IPC against the petitioner should be quashed. +1 more

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner failed to appear on 10.10.2025 and again on 13.10.2025 (matter relisted under the caption 'For Dismissal'); concluding that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the matter, the Court held it had no option except to dismiss the Criminal Petition for non-prosecution.

Key takeaways

As a sequel to the dismissal, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed.ratio¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Criminal Petition No. 3886 of 2022 (Telangana HC) under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: K Sangayya Math, Principal (under dismissal) of Dhakhin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha, sought quashment of FIR No. 17512021 registered at Saifabad police station, Hyderabad, accusing him of offences under Sections 408, 420, 461, 468 and 471-A of IPC (the I.A. prayer variant prints 467 instead of 461); respondent No. 2 (complainant side) is DBHPS represented by its secretary G. Selvarajan. Interim Application No. 2 of 2022 had sought stay of further proceedings including arrest. With no representation by the petitioner on 10.10.2025, the matter was reposted to 13.10.2025 under the caption 'For Dismissal'; on that day too the petitioner did not appear. By order dated 13.10.2025, Justice J. Sreenivas Rao dismissed the Criminal Petition for non-prosecution and, as a sequel, closed pending miscellaneous petitions, if any. The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the quashment prayer and granted no relief.

A

[³³⁰³ I

I I

;

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

CRIMI NAL PETITION NO:3886 OF 2022

Between:

1 K Sangayya Math, S/O K MahantayyaMath Aged about 45 years,Occu_. Pricipal (under dismissal) Dhakhin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha(OaUeSl nlO H.NO 6-2-572, chintal basthi, Khairatabad, Hyderabad

...PETtTtONER/ACC USED(S)

AND

State of Telangana, Rep by public prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad,

Dhakhin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha(DBHPS), Rep by its secretary G._Selvarajan,S/O not known Aged about 55 years,Ociu.secretary,-R/O H.NO 6-2-959, Khairatabad Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No 17512021 dated 24B|ZO21 U/S 408, 420,461, 468, 471-A of IPC against the Petitioner pending on the fite of Saifabad potice station, Hyderabad in the interest of justice and in the circumstances of the case.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2022

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceeding including arrest of the Petitroner in FIR No 17512021 dated 241312021 U/S 408, 42O,467,468.471-A of IPC against the Petitioner pending disposal of the criminal Petition in the interest of justice and in the circumstances of the case.

:

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V V L SUJATHA ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. M. Vivekananda Reddy the Asst. Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1.

The Court made the following: ORDER

i Ii i

: I

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIV'AS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3886 0F 2022

ORDER.

When this matter was taken up for r:onsicleration on 10.10.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either in physical mode or virtual mode. To give one more oppofiunity, the matter was posted to 13.10.2025 under the caption 'For Dismissal'

Today also, there is no representation on behatf of the petitioner, in spite of the matter being listed uncler the caption 'For Dismissal'. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, this Court has no o:tion except to dismiss the petition lor non-prosecution.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is dismissed lor

non-prosecutlon.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand

closed

SD/- K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSTSTANT REGISTRAR

( :7

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

The First Additional Chief Metropolttan Magiskate at Hyclerabad, Hyderabad

To,

,|

I

The SHO Saifabad^Police Station,^Hyderabad.

,/ 3. One CC to SRl.^V V^{L SUJATHAAdvocate} [OPUC] a ffi cc*o sRt. PUBLIC^{PRosEcuroR(TG) Advocate perooleoo!}

/

6^{TwoCD Copies}

PK\PSLw

i 1 i I I

a , i i

I ! I ;

HIGH COURT

\ \

DATED:1311012025

:.--:r
( o R :,
o
15 it[l/ u&,
"v
..*-.,.:-

CP.DAL

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTTON

CRLP.No.3886 ot 2022

BtdtA Xt-,.'cL.'

Issues for consideration

2 issues framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the FIR No. 17512021 pending on the file of Saifabad police station, Hyderabad, under Sections 408, 420, 461, 468, 471-A of IPC against the petitioner should be quashed.¶16
2.
Whether all further proceedings, including arrest of the petitioner, in the FIR should be stayed pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.¶18

Statutes considered

3 provisions across 2 enactments

AI extract

Cr.P.C.482¶16
IPC408, 420, 461, 468, 471-A¶16 408, 42O, 467, 468, 471-A¶18

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Registration of FIR No. 17512021 U/S 408, 420, 461, 468, 471-A of IPC against the petitioner, pending on the file of Saifabad police station, Hyderabad (date as printed is OCR-garbled and left unresolved).¶16
Saifabad police station, Hyderabad
Prior proceeding
Criminal Petition No. 3886 of 2022 filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of the FIR; interim application I.A. No. 2 of 2022 sought stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.¶18
Prior proceeding
On 10.10.2025, when the matter was taken up for consideration, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either in physical mode or virtual mode.¶26
Prior proceeding
To give one more opportunity, the matter was posted to 13.10.2025 under the caption 'For Dismissal'.¶26
Prior proceeding
On 13.10.2025 there was again no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'.¶27

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
K Sangayya Math¶10
V V L Sujatha
respondent
State of Telangana¶13
M. Vivekananda Reddy
respondent
Dhakhin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha (DBHPS)¶14

Coram

AI extract

J Sreenivas Raoauthor¶7

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 13 Oct 2025 · October
Registered: 22 Apr 2022
Case no.: CRLP/3886/2022
CNR: HBHC010271182022
Bench: J Sreenivas Rao
Disposal: DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION
Case type: Criminal Petition

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from J Sreenivas Rao

A. Ravichander Goud Vs Sri E.V. Narasimha Reddy, I.A.S.
10 Oct 2025
Raziya Sultana Vs The State of Telangana
10 Oct 2025
Nalla Jai Shanker Goud Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others
10 Oct 2025
Miryala (Nerellakunta) Atchutha Rao Vs Banoth Sunitha
13 Oct 2025
S. Shekar, Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary
13 Oct 2025
M/s Versatile Pharma Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others
13 Oct 2025

Cite this judgement

K.Sangayya Math v. State of Telangana, CRLP/3886/2022 (TEL), decided on 13 October 2025.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes3

Cr.P.C.482
IPC408, 420, 461, 468, 471-A · 408, 42O, 467, 468, 471-A

View all statutes

Procedural history5

Registration of FIR No. 17512021 U/S 408, 420, 461, 468, 471-A of IPC against the petitioner, pending on the file of Saifabad police station, Hyderabad (date as printed is OCR-garbled and left unresolved).Saifabad police station, Hyderabad
Criminal Petition No. 3886 of 2022 filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of the FIR; interim application I.A. No. 2 of 2022 sought stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.
On 10.10.2025, when the matter was taken up for consideration, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either in physical mode or virtual mode.

View full history

Bench / Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Parties & counsel