The High Court closed the contempt petition upon being satisfied by the respondents that they had implemented the earlier order by issuing proceedings. The court recorded that compliance had taken place and no further adjudication was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TIA/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2802OF 2024
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 197'tpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons to the respondents herein and punish the respondents for willfully and deliberately failing to implement the orders of the Honourable Court dated 271912023 in W.P.(T0 No. 1313 of 2017.
Between:
AND
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl.D BALAKISHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GPFORSERVICESI
The Court made the following: ORDER
E=?=*t!!z
THE T{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREEIVV I S RAO
CONTEMPTCA SE No.2802 of 2024
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed to punish tl t respondents_ contemnors for non-implementation of the order passeJ lty this Court, dated 27.09.2023 in W.P.(TR).No.l3l3 of 2017 invoking the provisions under Sections l0 to 12 of the Contempt r;. Courts Act, t97 t.
(
r"
2
adjudication is required in the contempt case.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/-T.VIJAY KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
I \
//TRUE CO SECTION OFFICER
To,
Education, (School Education) State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
Education Departm€nt, Govt. of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
TL/PSL -
Ii
HIGH COURT
DATED:10I10/2025
it
( Tl-l : t<br>oo-- /l rt 2i2[ z
*
,.
ORDER
CC.No.2802 ot 2024
CLOSING THE CONTEMPTCASE
&t ol ),L
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents willfully and deliberately failed to implement the order dated 27.09.2023 in W.P.(TR) No. 1313 of 2017?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. RAVICHANDER GOUD
ZADE RAMESH
M. RAMULU
M. CHANDRABHAN
C. VEERAIAH
K. SONE RAO
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
