Disposed¶24

Ganesh R, v. The State of Telangana.

Telangana HC30 Jan 2025CRLP/343/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, CRLP No.343 of 2025, decided 30-01-2025 by K. Sujana, J. Anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS; notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. already issued; Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar guidelines to be followed by Investigating Officer; EOW CCS Hyderabad; Crime No.B4 dt.05.03.2024; petitioner Ganesh R, Accused No.3; petition disposed of without going into merits; no bail granted or refused on merits.

What did the court decide?

No anticipatory bail ordered; the Investigating Officer was directed to follow the Arnesh Kumar guidelines, consider the petitioner's explanation and complete the investigation in accordance with law; miscellaneous applications, if any, stood closed. ¶24

Ganesh R, Vs The State of Telangana. — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^338s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K, SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 343 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ganesh R, S/o. G. Ramesh, aged about 30^years, Occ. Mechanic, R/o.26th^A Main, Jayanagar,^gth Block, Bangalore South, Bangalore, Karnataka^{560 069.}

¶9

...Petitioner/Accused No.3

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Through lnspector of Police, PS E.O.W. CCS, Hyderabad, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶12

...Respondent

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of BNSS^praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{High Courtmay be} pleased to direct the lnspector of Police, EOW, CCS, Hyderabad, to enlarge/retease the Petitioners/A3 on Anticipaiory Bail in the event^{of his arrest in} connection with the Crime No.B4, d1.05.03.2024, on the file of^{EOW, CCS,} Hyderabad.

¶14

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum^of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of^{Sri M P Kashyap,} Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor^{on behalfof the} Respondent.

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

I /

@77

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION No.343 of 2o25

¶21

ORAL ORDER:

¶22

Sri MP.Kashyap, learned counsei for the petitjoner submitted that a notice under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C. has already been issued to the petitioner.

¶23

Recording the said submission, without going into the merits of the case, tJle Investigating Officer is directed to follow the guidelines formulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar u. State of Bihorr scrupulously and shall consider the explanation offered by the petitioner and complete the investigation in accordance with law.

¶24

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶25

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall

¶26

also stand closed.

¶27

sdl- NloHD. tslclArL ASSTSTANT REGISTRAR ,/

//TRUE COPY//

tN^{ION OFFICER}

To,

l.TheXllAdditionalChieflvletropolitanMagistrateatNampally,Hyderabad 2.TheStationHouseOfftcer,lNSPADMlN(DD)PoliceStation,Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public^{Prosecutor,Highcourt for the stateof Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶32