Sanapala Praveen @ Abhinav @ Chinna Vs The State of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.779 of 2025

ORDER:

Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.4 in Crime No.1007 of 2024 of Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad, on bail, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

¶5

The brief facts of the case are that on 26.09.2024, on receiving credible information about running of brothel house under guise of Blissful Spa at Flat No.202, 2^nd floor, Amrutha Villa Apartment, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, the Police raided the said premises and noticed that with intention to earn money in ease manner, accused No.1, along with accused No.3 procured the victim women for participating in prostitution with the customers by offering attractive amounts. It is stated that on 05.11.2024 other accused persons went to the said premises for participating in illicit sexual intercourse. As such, accused persons along with the victim women have been taken into custody and seized cash and mobile phones. Based on the complaint, a case was registered vide Crime No.1007 of 2024 before the Panjagutta Police, Hyderabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144 of the BNS and Sections 3 to 5 of the PITA.

¶6

2

¶7

SKS,J Crl.P.No.779 of 2025

¶8

Heard Sri K.Sai Babu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner firstly submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he is no way concerned with the alleged offences. He secondly submitted that though there is no corroborative evidence, the petitioner was implicated in the case with false and fabricated allegations. He thirdly submitted that all the material witnesses were examined, and further detention of the petitioner is unnecessary. He fourthly submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 24.12.2024, causing undue hardship to his family. He fifthly submitted that the petitioner is resident of Neredmet, Hyderabad, with movable and immovable properties, and is willing to furnish sureties as directed. He lastly submitted that previously, bail application of the petitioner, vide Crl.M.P.No.5970 of 2025, was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case-Cum-Additional Family Court-Cum-XXIII Additional Chief Judge-Cum-IX Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, on 16.01.2025, without valid reasons and prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.

¶10

3

¶11

SKS,J Crl.P.No.779 of 2025

¶12

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that there are serious allegations against the petitioner and the investigation is not yet completed, therefore, granting bail to the petitioner, at this stage, does not arise. Hence, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

¶13

After considering submissions from both the parties and reviewing the record, since the petitioner is languishing in jail from 24.12.2024 and also material part of investigation is completed, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶14

i. The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.

¶15

ii. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

¶16

4

¶17

SKS,J Crl.P.No.779 of 2025

¶18