Lakhan Singh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Feb 2025CRLP/2165/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mention memo allowed; bail condition modification; wrong trial court name corrected; sureties rejected for want of jurisdiction; I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate replaced by II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad; personal bond Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for like sum; Criminal Petition Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025; I.A.No.1 of 2025; Telangana High Court; order dated 21.02.2025; SKS, J.

What did the court decide?

Modification and correction of paragraph No.6(i) of the bail order dated 18.02.2025 in Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025, substituting the II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad as the Magistrate before whom the personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each is to be executed; Registry directed to carry out necessary amendments and issue an amended copy. ¶¶6

Lakhan Singh Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶6

Issue for consideration

Whether the order dated 18.02.2025 passed in Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025 should be modified by correcting the name of the trial Court in condition No.(i), the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad having refused to accept the sureties for want of jurisdiction.

¶¶4

Court's answer

The interlocutory application I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed and the name of the trial Court in the order dated 18.02.2025 passed in Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025 is changed.

¶¶6

Ratio / Principle

Paragraph No.6(i) of the order dated 18.02.2025 passed in Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025 is modified and corrected to read that the petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad.

¶¶6

Key takeaways

The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments and issue an amended copy of the order.ratio¶¶6

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Telangana High Court (SKS, J), order dated 21.02.2025 on I.A.No.1 of 2025 ('for being mentioned') in Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025: Allowed correction of the bail order dated 18.02.2025. Paragraph No.6(i) was modified and corrected so that the petitioner shall execute a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, replacing the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, who had refused to accept the sureties on the ground that the Court does not have the jurisdiction. The Registry was directed to carry out the necessary amendments and issue an amended copy.

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

MAIN CASE: Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025

¶3

PROCEEDING SHEET

¶4

Sl. No.	DATE	ORDER	OFFICE NOTE
	21.02.2025	SKS, J I.A.No.1 OF 2025
		This application is filed under the caption ‘_for being mentioned’_praying this Court to modify the order dated 18.02.2025 passed by this Court in Crl.P.No.2165 of 2025. Heard learned counsel for petitioner.
		Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that_vide_order dated 18.02.2025 the petitioner was granted bail by this Court subject to compliance of conditions thereof, and that the condition No.(i) could not be complied with as the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, refused to accept the sureties on the ground that the Court does not have the jurisdiction for the same. As such, this application is filed praying this Court to modify the name of the trial Court in order dated 18.02.2025. Having regard to the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application, and

¶5

MAIN CASE No. Crl.P.No.2165 OF 2025

¶6

on co	nsidering the sub	missions made by learned
couns	el for petitioner,	this Court is inclined to
allow	this application,	by changing the name of
trial	Court in order da	ted 18.02.2025 passed in
Crl.P.	No.2165 of 2025.
	In view thereof,	paragraph No.6 (i) of the
order	dated 18.02.202	5 passed in Crl.P.No.2165
of 20 reads	25 is modified an as under:	d corrected, and the same
	“The petitioner	shall execute a
	personal bond	for a sum of
	Rs.25,000/- (Ru	pees Twenty Five
	Thousand only)	with two sureties for
	a like sum each	to the satisfaction of
	the learnedII	*Additional Chief*
	*Judicial Magist*	*rate, Hyderabad*.”
	Accordingly, the a Hence, the Regist	pplication is ordered. ry is directed to carry out
neces	sary amendments	and issue amended copy.
PT		_______ SKS, J

¶7

MAIN CASE No. Crl.P.No.2165 OF 2025

Lakhan Singh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakhan Singh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pudivalasala Durga Alias Swathi, Vs The State of Telangana

Sukumar Das Prabhu Vs The State of Telangana

Nagendra Ganapati Kini Vs the State of Telangana

Jitta Kiran Vs The State of Telangana

Kedala Pavan Kumar, Warangal and Another Vs Public Prosecutor, Karimnagar and Another

Bavuru Vs The State of Telangana