Dismissed¶¶20

Nagendra Ganapati Kini v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC17 Feb 2025CRLP/14498/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Hyderabad; CRLP No. 14498 of 2024; judge K. Sujana; decided 17-02-2025; bail petition under Section 482 BNSS for Crime No. 498 of 2024, P.S. Kushaiguda, Medchal-Malkajgiri District; offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC; DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION due to repeated absence of representation by petitioner's side; presumption petitioner not interested in proceeding; miscellaneous petitions closed; no relief granted; no case law discussed.

What did the court decide?

As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on several earlier occasions nor on the day of hearing, it is presumed that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the criminal petition. ¶¶19

Nagendra Ganapati Kini Vs the State of Telangana — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF^FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K: SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 14498 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Nagendra Ganapati Kini, S/o. Ganapati Kini^{Agedabout 48 years,Occ.} Buisiness, residing at A/103, Kulswamini^{Residency,Plot No- 183, oppo-site} Raghunath Vihar^gate A, Sector 13, Navi^{Mumbai, Kharghar, Raigarh 410210'} Maharashtra, lndia

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACC USED

¶10

AND

¶11

The State Of Telangana, (at the instance of Kushaiguda Police Station)^{Rep. by} Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, Hyderabad

¶12

...RESPONDENT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.,^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^{Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner / Accused on^{Bail in the event of his arrestin} Crime No. 498 of 2024, on the file of P.S. Kushaiguda, at^{MedchalMalkajgiri} District, for the offences^punishable U/s. 406 and 420 of^lPC.

¶14

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^{Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of^{Sri PAVAN} KUMAR V YADAVALLI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the^{AdditionalPublic} Prosecutor on behalf of the Sole Respondent.

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶16

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶17

CRIMINAL PE.TITION No.14498 of2024

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

There u,as no representation on behalf of peLitioner on the earlier several occasions. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. I t is presumed that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the criminal petition.

¶20

Hence, the Criminal petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶21

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand

¶22

closed.

¶23

Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶24

//TRUE COPY//

¶25

fur SE,CtION OFFICER