Petitioner sought quashing of FIR for offences under Sections 85 and 316(2) BNS and Section 3 Dowry Prohibition Act. Court observed the spouses are living together without grievance and directed the Investigating Officer to consider closing the proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[!2511
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTHDAYOFMARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13138 OF 2024
Between:
Baswani Pavan Kumar, S/o.B.Bhaskara Rao, aged 29 years, Occ.Pvt. Employee, R/o.SF-1, Kasturi Towers,Pala Bazar,Prasadampadu, Vijayawada.
...Petitioner/Accused nO.1
AND
...RespondenU De facto Complainants
Petition under Section 528 of BNSSprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the t\Iemorandum of Groundsof criminalPetition, the Highcourt may be pleased to call for the records relating topetitioner/AccusedNo 1 in Crime No. 365 ot 2024 of Saroornagar W.P.S.,Rachakonda'Ranga Reddy District for the offences Under sections 85, 316(2)of BNS, U/s.3of Dowry ProhibitionActand quash the same as it is abuse of process of law
I.A. NO: 2OF 2024
Petition under Section 528 ofBNSS praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof criminal Petition.theHrgh court maybe pleased To stay of all further proceedingsincluding arrestin pursuant to the crime 'Nlo 365 oI 2024 of Saroornagar W.P.S-, Rachakonda, Ranga Reddy District, which is against tothe petitioner/Accused No.1, pending disposalof the main Crrminal Petition
i t III I i i i l
': I ,' i i !
This Petiticn coming on for hearing, upon perusing the llemorandum of Grounds o1 Crirr iral Petition and upon hearing the argun ents ,:f Sri RAIvIANA ALLU, Advocate, ror thepetitioner and thepublic prosecutor (TCi) on behalf of the Respondent No.. and None appeared for the Respondent Nr>. 2.
The Court rnade the following: ORDER
l
{ I
I t
THD HONOURABLE SRI WSTICEK.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.13138OF 2024
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is fiIed by thepetitioner/Accused No.l, seeking to quash theproceedings inCrimeNo.365of 2024, on the fiIe of WPS., Saroornagar,Rachakonda, R. R. District. The petitioner is alleged for theoffencesunder Sections 85, 316(2) of BNS, u/s.3of Dowry Prohibition Act.
2
i
\
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPTJ-TY REGISTRAR
i
qE:CTION OFFICER
To,
u
1 I|.|. l.LAc,.l tvekop^oLilanMagistrateat L.B.Nagar,Cybe.raberd. Z. lhe :itatr.I {ouse Officer, Saroornagar WPS (RachikonrJa) llachakonda Dist
Sl\rllglr
HIGH COL'RT
DATED: 1910312025
ORDER
CRLP.No.13138 of 2024
-1=1HE rsl4
(
( o L
J 1(
)
o
03,r:l 2[25 c
+ t
C6 sD/ ! ( H gO
DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
N v
,C
1 issue framed by the court
Should the proceedings in Crime No. 365 of 2024 against the petitioner be closed given that the spouses are living together without disputes?
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Baswani Pavan Kumar
The State of Telangana, Rep. by the S.H.O., Saroornagar W.P.S., Rachakonda
Smt. T. Chamundeswari Devi
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
