Dismissed¶58

Sri. K. Hanuman Naik v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Mar 2025CRLA/595/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of criminal appeals - Telangana High Court - CRLA Nos. 595 and 880 of 2018 - Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. - judgments of Special Magistrates in C.C.No.281 of 2016 and C.C.No.148 of 2016 - permission to withdraw sought by counsel Ms. Srilatha vide letter dated 12.03.2025 - permission accorded - appeals dismissed as withdrawn - miscellaneous petitions closed - no merits adjudicated - K. Surender, J. - respondents included State of Telangana and K. Narsimha Reddy (accused, none appeared).

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the appeals granted; Criminal Appeal Nos. 595 and 880 of 2018 dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. ¶58

Sri. K. Hanuman Naik Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

13251t

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL APPE AL Nos : 595 and 880 of 20f8

¶7

Criminal Appeal No.59 5 of 2018

¶8

Appeal filed under Section 37 8(4) o'f cr.p.c against the Judgment dated 16-05-2017 passed in cc.No.281 of 2016 on the file of the court of the lil Special lvlagistrate, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy at LB Nagar.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Sri K. Hanuman Naik, S/o K Dakya, Aged about years, R/o. H_No.g-4_g3, plot No 14. Padmaraonagar Cotony, Xirmanghat, Hydeiabad - 5000079.

¶11

...Appellant

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of_Telangana. Rep. by its public prosecutor. High Court at Hyderabad, For the State of Telangana and Andhra piaddsh.

¶14

2 K, Narsimha Reddy Sio K. Hanumanth Reddy, Age:64 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Vinay Nagar, Sardabad. Hyderabad 500d59.-

¶15

...RespondenUAccused

¶16

Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. Srilatha

¶17

Counsel forthe Respondent No..l: Sri M. Vivekananda Reddy, Assistant Public Prosecutor

¶18

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: None Appeared

¶19

Criminal Aooeal No.880 of 20'18

¶20

Appeal filed under Section 378( ) of Cr.p.C against the Judgment dated 25'05-2017 passed in cc.No.148 of 2016 on the file of the court of the lt speciat l\rlagistrate at Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District.

¶21

Between:

¶22

!, !t.a.1ongr_leddy,^{S/o U NarsimhaReddy, Age:40 years,} Occ: Business, R/o H No 1-'108, Ganesh Nagar, RagannaguAa Ciampah.tiyrt,^{-iry"thiii-J.Ji} Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶23

... Appe lla nUCom p la i nant

¶24

The State of_Telangana, Re-p_. by its public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Fcr the State ofTelangana and Andhra piade"sh

¶25

K. Narsimha Reddy, S/o. K..Hanumanth Reddy. Age:64 years Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.17-'t-383/91-A. Vrnay Nagar. SirOaiiaO"HyOe'rabaO.^{- --}

¶26

...RespondenUAccused

¶27

Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. Srilatha

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: Sri M. Vivekananda Reddy, Assistant Public^prosecutor

¶29

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: None Appeared

¶30

The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶31

---7

¶32

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶33

CRJMINAL APPEAL NoS.595 AND 88O OF 2018

¶34

COMMON JUDGMENT:

¶35

Ms. Srilatha, learned counsel appeared through online representing learned counsel for the appellants, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these Criminal Appeals and also submitted a lette r, dated 12.03.2025, to that extent.

¶36