Dismissed¶38

Jadhav Rajendra Prasad @ Sonu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Oct 2025CRLP/12977/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court (Hyderabad), single Judge (Smt. Justice K. Sujana), order dated 08-10-2025 in CRLP.No.12977 of 2025, Jadhav Rajendra Prasad @ Sonu v. The State of Telangana (PS Gudihatnoor, Adilabad). Petition under Section 482 BNSS for anticipatory bail in FIR No.20212025 dated 09-09-2025; dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's request; no ruling on merits; no quantum. Advocates: S. Chandrasekhar for petitioner; D. Arun Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State.

What did the court decide?

Permission was accorded to learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the Criminal Petition. ¶20

Jadhav Rajendra Prasad @ Sonu Vs The State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12977 OF 2o2s

¶6

Between:

¶7

Jadhav Rajendra Prasad @^{Sonu,S/o. Late Ganesh,aged 25 years, Occ.Coolie,} R/o. Gudihatnoor village, Mandal Gudihatnoor, District Adilabad State of Telangana

¶8

...Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, through Police Station Gudihatnoor, District Adilabad, rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court, at Hyderabad.

¶11

...RespondenUCom plainant

¶12

Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner/Accused No. t herein, granting anticrpatory barl in the event of his arrest in F.l.R. No.20212O25 dated 09-09-2025 of Police Station Gudihatnoor, District Adilabad, and to pass any such other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶13

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Chandrasekhar, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri D Arun Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent state.

¶14

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶15

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶16

CRIMINAL PETITION No.L2977 of 21125

¶17

ORDER:

¶18

karned counsel for the pctitioner sought permission of

¶19

this Court to u ithdraw thc Criminal Petition.