Disposed

Rehana Begum v. Dr. K. Ilambarithi

Telangana HC12 Dec 2025CC/205/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a writ order concerning GHMC officials. Counsel for the petitioners submitted on instructions that the respondents had already complied with the order under contempt. The Court closed the contempt case and all pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed on recording submission of compliance; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Rehana Begum Vs Dr. K. Ilambarithi — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ ]

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO

¶4

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2O5OF 2025

¶8

Contempt Case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1 97 1 to punish the Respondents for willfully not complying/implementing the orders of this Hon ble Court dated 17.1O.2024 made in W.P.No.28659 of 2024.

¶9

Between :

¶10

Rehana Begum, D/o.lVlohammed Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 42 years, Occ Household R/o. H.No.9-4-29l4/E, Hakeempet, Tolichowki, Hyderabad

¶11

F arzana Begum, D/o.Mohammed Abdul Qayyum, Aged about 42 years, Occ Household, R/o. H. No. 9-4-291 4lE, Hakeempet, Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

¶12

... Petitioners/Petitioners

¶13

AND

¶14

1 Dr. K. llambarithi, The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad lvlunicipal Corporation, Lower Tunk Bund, Hyderabad.

¶15

2 Ms. Shashirekha, Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle - 13 Karwan, K.Z. Khairtabad, Hyderabad

¶16

3 Ms. Pavani, Assistant City Planner -13, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Khairtabad Zone, Hyderabad District

¶17

4 Shaik Sultan, S/o. Late Shaik lvlohammed, Age. Not known, Occ Pvt Employee, Rio. 9-4-29-56, Hakeempet, Tolichowki, Golconda, Hyderabad^- 500008

¶18

..Contemnors

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Midde Arun Kumar^(SC FOR GHMC) The Court made the following :ORDER

¶20

¶21

IN THE HIGII COURTFOR THE STATE OF -I-11 LANGANA AT HYDEITAI]AT)

¶22

IIE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSH J IAN

¶23

CONTEN'IPT CASE No.205 of 2025

¶24

.fIIE T2.h D;\Y OIT DECEMBER,2()2i

¶25

Betlvccn:

¶26

Rchana Bcgum and anothcr

¶27

.. Petitioners

¶28

AND

¶29

Dr. K.llambar ithi and thlee others

¶30

Respondents

¶31

0RAL^()IT.DEII

¶32

Nh'. Sreenivas Rao Velivela, learned counsel lor he pctitioncrs,

¶33

on instrr.rctions, rvould suburit that respondents have llr rady cornplied

¶34

rvith the ordcr uuclcr contcmlrt

¶35

In tlie lisht ol thc saicl subrnission, this Co;i etnpt Casc is closed

¶36

As a sequel thereto. miscellancous petitions, i1- r ry, pending in

¶37

the Cor-rteurpt Case shall stand closed

¶38

SD/- K,AMMAJI DE PUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

;ECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, Advocate [OPLt ]

¶44

¶45

One CC to Srl l\Iidde Arun Kumar^(SC For GHMC), Advcc lte [OPUC]

¶46

Two CD Copies Svs/PSL

" ll:;M

I l I I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 2112t2025

ORDER

CC.No.205 of 2025

L
:,} i
2 6 tit 2t2[
()o
(_
*
D c ,r,,a1)/

¶55

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE

¶56

0 1L
a

Rehana Begum v. Dr. K. Ilambarithi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rehana Begum v. Dr. K. Ilambarithi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangapuram Veera Swamy, Vs Sri. Dr. S. Harish, I.A.S.

Arabandi Lakshmi Shiva Naga Phanisree, Vs Sri Dr.S.Harish, I.A.S.

Dr. T. Sri Divya Vs Dr. G. Suresh Kumar

Sri. S. Yadagiri Vs Sri. Arun Kumar Reddy

Lankela Srinivas Reddy Vs P.S.Sravan Kumar

S. Tirupathi Vs Kyama Venkata Swamy