Disposed

Arabandi Lakshmi Shiva Naga Phanisree, v. Sri Dr.S.Harish, I.A.S.

Telangana HC5 Dec 2025CC/1920/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition alleging willful violation of a writ order dated 16-03-2023. Government pleader produced compliance proceedings dated 19-12-2023 showing the order under contempt was complied with. The Court closed the contempt case with liberty to challenge those proceedings and no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; liberty granted to challenge proceedings dated 19-12-2023; no order as to costs.

Arabandi Lakshmi Shiva Naga Phanisree, Vs Sri… — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1920 OF 2023

¶8

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts^{Act, 1971 to} punish the respondents herein for their willful and deliberate dtsobedience towards the Orders of the High Court dated 16-03-2023^passed rn W P.No.⁷¹⁰³ of^2023.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Arabandi Lakshmi Shrva Naga Phanisree,, W/o Swarna Raveendra,^{H,No. - 1-} 10,Aged about 31 years Jannaram Village, Enkoor Mandal,^Khammam District, Telangana State.

¶11

PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

Sri Dr.S Harish, 1.A.S.,, The District Collector, Rangareddy^District.

¶14

...CONTEMNORYRespondent No.2

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. K KIRAN KUMAR

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR REVENUE

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

\ \

¶19

¶20

HON'BLE SRIJUSTTCE K. LAKSII\ t{N CON-rEMPT CA SENo.7920 0r,- 2!.j

¶21

DATE : 05- t2-2 02s.

¶22

Betrveen

¶23

Mrs. Arabandj Lakshnri Shiva Naga phanisree

¶24

Petitioner Vs

¶25

Dr. S. Harish. I.A.S., The Distriq ( ollc.cror. Raneareddy Dislric t.

¶26

Respondent

¶27

This Court ntade thc fbllorvirrg:

¶28

ORA LORDER

¶29

This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful ir, rl deliberate violation of orclerdatc,d I6.03.2023 inW.p.No.7l03 of :,.1 i|3. 'Ihere rs no l.epresentation on behalf of the pe_t ioner, both durin-u pre-lunch and post-lunch.

¶30

Ms. Tekuru Su,etcha, learned Assistant Government pleader fur Revenue, has produced ryritten instmctions along with f 1)ceedings dated rg '12'2023 0f the rcspondent to contend that the res., xldent has already complied with the order under contempt. The sanLr is placed on record

¶31

¶32

',.,.

¶33

In the light of the above,^{the presentContemptCase is closed}

¶34

I{owcver, liberty 1S granted to the petitioner to challenge^the

¶35

proceedings dated 19.12.2023^{of the respondent.[n the circumstanoes}

¶36

of the case, there shall^{be no orderas to costs.}

¶37

As a sequel thereto,^{miscellaneouspetitions,if any, pending in}

¶38

the contcmpt^case shall^{stand closed}

¶39

SD/. N.CHANDRA^SEKHARRAO DEPUTY^REGIS

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 One CC to SRl.^{K KIRAN KUMAR Advocate IOPUC]}

¶44

2 Two CCs to GP^{FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana} lourl

¶45

3 Two CD CoPies

TPK/,PSI yt

HIGH COURT

DATED:0 511212025

.-a
( () I THE !)
6
)
( \i
| [{8 ?n?6 E
.. +
..{
'('.--
ri. ':-r' ,ICllfl *.

¶50

ORDER

¶51

CG.No.1920 of 2023

¶52

CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED

¶53

(9 "{D
\a

Arabandi Lakshmi Shiva Naga Phanisree, v. Sri Dr.S.Harish, I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arabandi Lakshmi Shiva Naga Phanisree, v. Sri Dr.S.Harish, I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. G.V. Satyavathi Vs Dappu Narasimha

Ak Ramesh Kumar Vs Air Force Officers Co-operative Housing Society Limited

M/s.Variman Global Enterprises Ltd. Vs Sri P. Ravinder

Gangapuram Veera Swamy, Vs Sri. Dr. S. Harish, I.A.S.

Dr. T. Sri Divya Vs Dr. G. Suresh Kumar

Mr. Mohd Sajid Ali Vs Vinay Reddy