A writ petition challenging contemplated deduction of permit fee from bills payable to a contractor was withdrawn by counsel's request before substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOt'R
PRESENT
THE HONOUR.ABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:9965 OF 2024
Between:
!t/. QSRConstructions,Rep.by its Managingpartner, Mr. B.SanieevReddy, S/o. Dharma Reddy, aged 56 Yrs., H.No.12--1-94, Bharath Nag'ar, Siddi[6i Town and Dstrict.
.,.PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutirm of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, dedaring the action of the respond€nts in conlemplating to deduct "permit fee" stipulated under G.O. Ms. No_ 21 dated 31-03-2022 frorn the bills payable to the petitioner company in relation to {he works being execu{ed by the petitioner company vide Agreement vide No.L.S.A.B. No.2Bl2O23-24 dated 28-08-2023 pertaining to Siddipet District under respondents as illegal, arbilrary anc contrary the terms and conditions of the respective agreernents and further
directtheresponceltSnottodeductanyamountstitledas,.Permill:ee',videGo Ms.21 dated31-O3-t'O22from the Billspayable to the petitioner cornpany by the respondentsunder:lte respectiveagreements-
IANO :1 OF2O24
PetitionUnde{sectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircllms'.i]ncesstated in the affidavitfited n support of the petltion, the HighCourt n ay be pleasedto grant interimdire<;ticns restrainingthe Respondentsfrommakir g any deductions towardspurporte(l ,.|)ermitFee,,fromRunningBills arising out :xe(:.Ltionof work pursuant to the AgreementvideNo.L.S.A.B.No.2812023-24rjatec28-08-2023 pertainingtoSidclip:tDistrictunderrespondentNo.3awarde<linl-avourofthe PetitionercomPianY.
Counsel forthe Petitioner:SRI LINGAMPELLYRAVINDER
counsel for theRes pondentNo.'l : GP FOR MINES AND GEOL CGY Counset for theRes,pondent No.2 to 4: GP FOR ROADS & BUI -DINGS Counsel for theRes,pondent No.5 to 7: GP FOR PAY & ACCOIINTS The Court madeth€ following:ORDER
/
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY IVRIT PETITION No.9965 of 2o24
ORDER:
' Pursuant to a letter, dated 20.09.2024, given by the learned counsel for the petitioner to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission to withdraw the Writ petition, this Writ
Petition is posted under the caption .,for withdrawal,,.
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if
any, shall stand closed
SD/-A.V.S. P AD ASSISTANT REG
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2310912024
ORDER WP.No.9965t f 2024
..<br>'i' l'
><br>.: ti
i ' ;[2t
,1. ':
.j'
\i'\1, , .,
\i -:. _
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRI\WN,
WITHOUT COSTS
-5
2 provisions across 2 enactments
QSR Constructions, rep. by its Managing Partner Mr. B. Sanjeev Reddy
The State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, Mines and Minerals Department
The Engineer in Chief, Roads and Buildings Department, Hyderabad
The Superintending Engineer, Roads and Buildings Department, Circle Siddipet
The Executive Engineer, Roads and Buildings Department, Siddipet
Assistant Pay and Accounts Officer, Siddipet
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
