Writ petition concerning allegedly illegal grant of construction permission based on faked documents; counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e61
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEC.V.BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITIONNO:755OF 2O22
Between:
D Viiava Lakshmi,Wo LateD Srinivas,.Aged about60 vears Occ House ftitljl?7.%:i'i'-sii/Erzolsrliii Vrni"r'r.rr"g*, Amberpet,Malakpetcolonv, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiledtherewith' the High Courtmay be pleased to issue anappropriate writ, order or directionmore in the nature of Mandamus'declaringtheinactionofrespondentsmoreparticularlythatof respondents 2and 3 in granting permissionto 4th respondentfor land formingpart of Sy No67 with a house number shown as 1-11 -4' Chinna Thokatta vide a resolutiondated17t1212O21for an extentof 453 square yardsprincipallyin the categoryof old housefor construction of Ground plus2 upperfloors and further to an extentof 160 squareyards for constructionof Ground plus2 upperfloors in excesstheareaoffakedocumentssubmittedbyhimwithoutconsideringmy representationsdaled 17t12t2021and 1811212021as being lllegal, ArbitraryUn Constitutional,being violativeof Articles 21 and 3004'againstthe Letter and spirit of Catena ofJudgments renderedby this HonorableCourt as well that of
Honorable Supreme Court of lndia apart from being violative ofprinciples of natural Justice andr:air play.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in :;upport of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct respondents 2 and 3 to hold an enquiry on representations ofpetitioner dated 1711212021 and 1811212021 pending the disposal ofpresent writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI IMMANENI RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, Dy. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI K.R.KOTESHWARA RAO, SC FOR SCB
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
-l
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
V/RIT PETITIONNo.755of2022
ORDER:
Learned counselappearingfor the petitioner seeks permission to withdrawthe Writ Petition and also hledmemo
dated 04.O9.2O24to the said effect.
Permission as soughtfor is accorded.
Accordingly, theWrit Petitionis dismissed as withdrawn'
No costs.
As a sequel thereto,MiscellaneousPetitions, ifany'
pe4drpg,,9!r4!qtand disErisse.d.
SD/- K. SREE RAMA MURTHY
//TRUE COPY//
ASSTSTANTEE9JSTRAR )..SECTION OFFICER
To
1 One CC to SRI IMMANENI RAMA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, Dy. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF rNDrA [OPUC]
J One CC to SRI K.R.KOTESHWARA RAO, SC FOR SCB [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies
PSK.
LS
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 109t2024
ORDER
WP.No.7S5 of 2022
a 1 ilE S Tz1 I{:
aa
.) ,1025 6(>
o O B JAl{ o
OA ;,A tC<br>
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
I
e/)
(/
6
q \r r.ln
D. Vijaya Lakshmi
The Union of India, Represented by Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defence
The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer
The President, Secunderabad Cantonment Board
Vijay Kumar, Document Writer (SRO Bowenpally)
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
