Aleti Jagga Reddy and 3 Others v. the Joint Collector,Karimnagar and 5 Others

Telangana HC9 Dec 2024WP/18988/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged a revenue order via writ petition seeking mutation of land. The High Court allowed the petition as the parties compromised and filed a civil suit, declaring the writ cause no longer survives.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed without order as to costs pending the decision of the civil suit filed on compromise.

Aleti Jagga Reddy and 3 Others Vs the Joint… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COI,,RT FOR THE STATE Of TELANGAI.IA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Juriscliction)

¶2

{^3302I

¶3

MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF DECET\T8ER TWO TI..IOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 18988 OF 2012

¶7

Between:

¶8

'1. Aleti Jagga Reddy, s/o Madhava Reddy, aged about 60 years,

¶9

Aleti Ramgopal Reddy, s/o Madhava Reddy, aged about 57 years 3. Aleti Sidda Reddy, s/o Madhava Reddy, Aged about 55 years 4. Aleti Sahadeva Reddy, s/o Madhava Reddy, Aged about 52 years, Al1 are r/o Godavarikhani' Karimnagar District

¶10

...'ETIT'.NERS

¶11

AND.

¶12

The Joint Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar Karimnagar, District.

¶14

The Tahsildar, , Husnabad Mandal, Karimnagar District,

¶15

Eallu Vera Narayana, s/o Bhadraiah, aged ma)or rlo Potharam village, Husnabd Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶16

Aleti Premsagar Reddy, s/o Ramana Reddy, aged l.4ajor, r/o Potharam village, Husnabd Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶17

Bethu Anuradha, w/o Rajamou,li, aged major r/o Potharam village, Husnabd Mandal' Karimnagar District

¶18

...RES''NDENT'

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Directron. more particularly one in the natu{e of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent dismissing the Revision Petition No. 0-l/164/201O dt. 24-4-2012 fned by the petitircners confirming the orders passed by the 2nd respondent in Appeal No.D/4692/2004 dt. 13-5-2008, as being il.legal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondent authorities to mutate the names of the petitioners and to issue the pattedar pass books to the petitioners herein in respect of the land adrneasuring Ac. O-17 gts in Sy.No. 282

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201:I(WPMP. NO: 24333 OF 20121

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent dismissing the Rr:vision Petition No. D1116412010 dl. 24-4-2012 filed by the petitioners confirrring the orders passed by the 2nd respondent in Appeal No.D/4692/2004 dt.^'13-5-2008, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition

¶22

Counsel for the Pr:titioner: SRl. N. HARI PRASAD

¶23

Counsel for the R,:spondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR REVENUE

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4to6:-

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

¶27

¶28

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.18988 of 2OL2

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the unofficial respondents submits that both the parties have entered compromise and fil,ed a petition utde O.S.No.7O of 2021, be{ore Ist Additional Junior Civil Judge at Husnabad. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survlve.

¶32

Recording the aforementioned submission, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this

¶34

petition, shall stand closed.

¶35

SD/.V. ITHA ASSISTANT^REGITRAR

/TTRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

2 ?,l: 33:","' t rt^{SAim-'0Pi aflf at'fi 5i'ils t' t" ot rer ans a na at} Hvderabad [OUTI 3 Two CD CoPies BM GJP (r

HIGH COURT

DATED:09112t2024

ORDER

WP.No.189tt8 of 2012

gc S147 €
4i (i
I
I ,:. '<br>3 04 i'il'ri 2025 L )
.l.
at
c€.spa-r.

¶45

CLOSING TI.IE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS
P'*
ls v >5
6c i)

Aleti Jagga Reddy and 3 Others v. the Joint Collector,Karimnagar and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aleti Jagga Reddy and 3 Others v. the Joint Collector,Karimnagar and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhukya Shankar Vs Smt. a. Vani Prasad, IAS

Ameena Begum and Another Vs the State of a.P., Repby Prl. Secy to Rev. Dept and 8 Otehrs

Pathan Baji Khan, Pallu Saheb Vs Smt Pranitha Tamne

Nimmanagooti Saidulu Vs The State of A.P.

Gitte Namdev s/o Baba Rao, Vs The District Collector, Adilabad District

M/S Sri Venkateshwara Coop Farming Scty,Hyd,and 11 Otrs Vs Jnt Collector,Hyd,and 5 Otrs