A writ petition under Article 226 regarding alleged illegal allotment of a security guard tender was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause no longer needed adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OFIVIARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 9208 OF 2013
Between:
M/s. Viswas Security Force, Regd.No.4O|2OO4,lvlanuguru, KhammamDistlict Rep. by its Managin-g Partner E.SrinivasS/o Mallaiah, aged about 3!-Y_rg'^flo Quartei No.T2l148,BombayColony. Manuguru, KhammamDistrict-507 125
...PETITIONER
AND
..RESP.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oflhe Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring theaction of the respondentsin allotting tender on 23-3-2013 to the 6th respondentpursuant to the tender notification bearingNo. MN1'1200260, dated 5-2-2013,the tender notification bearing No. MN'1 1200260' daled 5-2-2013 in allotting thework of deploying 64 security guardsand 2 security supervisor for oneyear inviolationof the earlier contract dated18-4-2008 and extended on12-1-2013foraperiodof 14-1-2013to14-1-2014tothepetitionerby the respondents of thesame work is illegal, arbitrary, null and void and consequently directthe respondentsto award the contractto the petitioner of
deploying64 securityguards and 2 security supervisorin SCCL ManuguruMines asper the contractdated-18-4-2008and being extendedon 12-1-2013 by the respondentsinfavourofthepetitionerforaperiodofoneyearfroml-4-20131o14-2Ol4sublectlopermanentrecruitmentbytherespondentsinSCCLManuguru Mines,pending disposalof the writ petition'
I.A.NO:1OF20 13(WPMP.NO: 11484 OF2013)
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto suspendthe lenderdt-23-03 2013 allottedto the respondentNo O by the respondentslto5undertendernotificationbearingMNll200260dt.5-2.2013' permitting thepetitionerto continue the work in accordanceto the termsand conditionsofthecontractdatedl8-4.2008(purchaseorderNo.7500005127)and extendedonl2-1-20l3foraperiodofoneyearfroml_4-2013to1-4-2014in deploying64 Security Guards and 2 Security Supervisors in SCCL Manuuru Mines subjecttopermanentrecruitmentbytherespondentstothesameposts'pending disposalof the writ Petition'
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI S'MADAN MOHAN RAO ;;;;;i ior the RespondentNos.1 ro 5: SRI NANDIGAM KRISHNARAO' Sc
FOR SCCL
Counselfor the Respondent No'6: ---
The Courtmade the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE NAGFSHBHEEMAPAXA
WRIT PETITION No.92O8of 2O13
ORDER:
When the matter istaken up forhearing'
learned counsel forpetitioner submitsthat the causein the writ petition does not survivefor adjudication.
1S 2 Recording the saidsubmission,this writ petition dismissed as infructuous'No order as to costs'
Miscellaneous applications,pending ifany, shall stand
clo sed.
\ sor-,r naRlPRAS D ASSISTANTREGIST R
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To ,1 . 3ffi 33lSSEi itri,?ex,}1PHA[fti'-#$i""t33ts31toPUC] J . TwoCD CoPies PSK. KKS
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 310312024
ORDER
WP.No.9208 of 2013
1 rlE SI.{ f(r
o
('
a) )
.J g g prv 2024
*
6 sPa-r c
DTSMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
@ oq'* \NZ
a\o
6oN-
M/s. Viswas Security Force (Rep. by E.Srinivas)
The Singareni Collieries Co.Ltd.
The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited
The Manuguru Purchase Department
The Chief General Manager (Purchase)
The Director Project and Welfare
Nagesh Bheemapada
Nripendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
