The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s. Microl Remedies seeking a mandate against interference with the petitioner's bio-products manufacturing and sale. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation appeared from the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
tr
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 15701 OF 2013
Between:
M/s. Microl Remedies Rep by its Proprietor- Dr,Veera RaghavaiahS/o-late Basava Punnaiah, Hindu, aged about 55years, Office Laurel House,Plot No.5-35/304/'1 , lVythri Nagar, Behind HUDATruck Parking, Kukatpally,R.R. Dist.
.,.PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the actionof the respondents in interfering withthe manufacturing and sale of thepetitioner Bio-products as illegal, arbitrary, u n con stitutiona I and withoutjurisdictionand further direct the respondents not to interfere with in any manner in themanufacture,sale and distributionof the petitioners Bioproducts
LA. NO: 1OF 2013(WPMP.NO: 19020OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleasedto direct the respondents herein toallow the petitioner to manufacture, sale and distribute the Bio-productsincludingfromthe licensed premisesof the dealers/ stockists under the lnsecticides Act,1968and the Fertilizerscontrol (order) Act 1985
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt.G. L. NAGESWARRAO
Counsel for the Respondents:GP FORAGRICULTURE
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO.157OI OF 2013
ORDER:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption ,,for dismissal", when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter.
Consequently, miscellaneoqs applications, if ary, pending shall stand closed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI N OFFICER
$
I
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210312024
ORDER
WP.No.15701 of 2013
1 rlE sTAr 6
C
({ (
a 1,i
,J ? 3 A P B 2 02 4 r. l't
-:'. //
o
o
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS G)W',t ffi"
M/s. Microl Remedies Rep by its Proprietor- Dr.Veera RaghavaiahS/o-late Basava Punnaiah
The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture AndhraPradesh
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Nagesh BheemapaKa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
