It is stated that petitioner having 40 years experience used to participate in biddings whenever ca-lled for by the AMCs. for repairing and maintenance of such weigh bridges, machines etcetera. The 46 respondent - Secretary, AMC, Bhainsa, issued notihcation on 30.09.2019 calling for tenders and petitioner submitted tender quoting lowest price, however, work was given to the 11ft respondent, being Proprietor of Ventek Weighing System, who quoted almost double the prices and who does not have any experience and genuine license for executing such type of works. It is the case of petitioner that he deposited EMD of Rs.3O,OOO/-, however, he was neither informed why he was not given the work nor returned the EMD. Almost after more than 7 months, when petitioner questioned the authorities, they simply handed over Demand Draft for Rs.30,0O0/-; further, the 4ft respondent cleared the amount to the llft respondent without getting completed all the process of said work assigned to him, through the experts i.e. l,egal Metrologr Ofhcers, inspection, verification and stamping, certification etcetera.
