Petitioners challenged the District Collector processing an online application by private respondents to delete their names from Dharani revenue records without notice, while civil suits over the land were pending with interim injunctions. The court directed the Collector to hear all parties and decide per law within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
I[:
[3168 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETI TION NO: 8674 0F 2024
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
i,
l5.RathlavathRamudu,S/o.PoolSingh,age49years,Occ.Agriculture. l6.RathlavathRaju,S/o-Hanumanthu,age3Tyears'OccAgriculture'
(Respondents 5 to 16 areR/o. JonnalabogudaVillage,Peddakothapally Mandat, NagarkurnoolDistrict)'
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedtherewith'the High Court maybe pleased to issuean appropriatewrit, order or direction more particularly onein the natureof writ of Mandamus, declaringthe action Of the 2nd respondent in making impugnedendorsementof ongoing Transaction Non SurveyNo /sub division nowith application No'SD240000321is under process in deletionof fictitioussurveyprocessbyresortingtodeletetheentriesinfavorofpetitioners names indharini portal for 1st petitionerland in Sy No 135iAAl2l11113lo an extent ofAc.0.03gts' 2nd petitioner absolute owner and possessorof the land in Sy.No.135/AA/4l4toanextentofAc0lTgts'3rdpetitionerlandinSy'No135 lAAt2t1tlt1t1t1to anextent ofAc 0 23 gts' 4th petitioner land in Sy.No.1 35/AA/4/3to an extent ofAc 0 02 gts' sth petitioner landin Sy.No.135iAA/21213to an extent of Ac'O02 gts and 6th land in Sy No 135/AA/2/ 1t2t4 lo anextent of Ac.0.02gts (total extentis Ac 1 09 gts) situatedat Sathapur village,PeddakothapalliMandal,NagarkurnoolDistrictbasrngonApplication No.SD240000321 hled by the 5th to 16th unofficial respondents is without jurisdiction as the aforesaidland has been converted for non agricultural purposes andbuildingpermission lsgranted vide Proc No 26lBP12024 Dt.18.03.2024as illegal,arbitrary and contraryto Pattedar PassbooksAct'2021' without iurisdictionand barred by limitation and consequentlyset asidethe aforesaidimpugned actionof the 2nd respondent'
IANO:1OF2024
Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto suspend theoperation of impugned endorsement"ongoing TransactionNon Survey No./sub division no with application No SD240000321is under process indeletionoffictitiousSUrveyprocess.,of2ndrespondentforlstpetitionerlandin
Sy.No.'135/AA/21 11113 to an extent of Ac.0.03 gts, 2nd petitioner absolute owner and possessor of the land in Sy No.'135/A Al4l4 to an extent of Ac 0..l 7 gts, 3rd petitioner land in Sy.No.'135 lAAt2t1t1l1t1t1 to an extent of Ac.0.23 gts, 4th petitioner land in Sy. No .135lAAl4l3 to an extent of Ac.0.02 gts, 5th petitioner land in Sy. No.'135/AA l2l2t3 to an extent of Ac.0.02 gts and 6th tand in Sy.No 135/AA/2111214 to an extent of Ac.0.02 gts (totat extent is Ac.1,09 gts) situated at sathapur village, Peddakothapalli lvlandal, Nagarkurnool District basing on Application No.SD240000321 fited by the Sth to 16th unofficial respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K.RATHANGA pANl REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: SRt SOMU SR|NIVAS REDDY, AGP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.S to 16: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
tl
il:
THE HONOURABLIi SRI JUSTICEK. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.8674 OF2024
ORDER:
Heard Mr. K. Rathanga Pani Reddy,learned counselfor the petitioners and Sri Somu SrinivasReddy, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue, forrespondentNos.1 to 4. ln view of the nature ofreliefsought by thepetitioners herein, notice to respondent Nos.5 to l6 is dispensedwith.
2
re
2024 and 62 of 2024 on thc file of learned principal Junior Civil Judge, at Kollapur, and interim injunction orders were granted in their favour..
l-
)
opportunityand consider the aforesaidonline applicationby followingdue procedurelaid down under law'
As a sequelthereto, miscellaneous applications' ifany'
pending in thewrit Petition stand closed.
SD,-P. GowRI SH RAR ASSISTANTREGI
FFICER ,,TRUECOPY" SECTION
\
BSR BS I \
I I
tI
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0310412024
ORDER
WP.No.8674 ot 2024
(
{.
:
t ,J
) [ 3 APi ?t?4 :,i
... I
r. ,',,
*,. -!1
,-',:':_{"
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the District Collector could process deletion of petitioners' names from Dharani records without notice or hearing.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rathlavath Raju
Rathlavath Ravi Naik
Rathlavath Aruna Kumari
Rathlavath Krishna
Rathlavath Shankar
Rathlavath Shiva Naik
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
