D.Muralidhar Reddy v. D.Srinivas Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for disobedience of order staying survey. Court found no survey conducted and received unconditional apology from respondent, leading to closure of the case and pending miscellaneous applications.
What did the court decide?
Petition and all pending miscellaneous applications in the Contempt Case are closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,l I i
\ \
i t ', I I IItt a Ii t t : I i I I I lr IT. It t I II I T I I
tt Tt
[3168],
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THETHIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FOUR
$r
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN
coN MPT CAS ENO:2027OF2022
contempt case filedunder Sections10 lo 12 of Contempt of courtsAct, to punish tf," n"iponO"ntshereinfor willfully violatingand disobeying the directions of this Hon'ble bourt dated18.10.2022passedin W.P.No'38779of 2022'
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should be continued given the unconditional apology.
Whether the issuing of the survey notice amounted to disobedience of the court order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Muralidhar Reddy
- respondent
I. D. Srinivas Reddy
- respondent
B. Ramakanta Rao
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/2027/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court