This is a contempt case where the petitioner alleged a violation of a High Court order directing expedited investigation. The respondent explained the delay due to lack of documents and FSL reports. The court found the reasons sufficient and dismissed the contempt petition, closing the case.
The contempt case is closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY. THE THIRDDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE No:1604 of202'l
Petition under sections10 to 12 of contemptof courts Act to punish the respondents herein forwillfully and disobeying/de{iberately/violatingthe orderof the High Court dated19-7-2021 passedin WP.No.16413 of 2O21.
Between:
K. Venkat Reddy, S/o PentaReddy,Age:6pyears, Occ: Advocate, Fyo 12-13- 6-srr, Sireet Nolis,l-ane No.2,Nalarju-naNaiar, Tamaka, Secunderabad'
...Petitioner
AND
. Sri G Madhu, S/o Notknown topetitioner'Occ:Sub-lnspector of Police, ^. . Athmakur(M) PS,Rachakondabommissionerate, Yadadri- Bhuvanagiri District.
...ResPondent
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. ANUGANTI PRANEETH
Counsel for the Respondent:GP FOR HOME
The Court made the follovving:ORDER
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CONTEM PT CASENO.1604 0F 2021
ORAL ORDER:
Mr. Anuganti Praneeth.learnedcounsel for the petitioner' None appears forthe resPondent.
corrnter aftidavit.
I
I I L
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
.3[J.iI+RB|5,"J.H
//TRUE COPY//
TO,
[4
SECTION OFFICER
:Ef"Aq{{,,T.[BlH[i,?%;,1:ffi:".t8[T,]*,anganaa,
CD/kamY{
I \
HIGH COURT DATED:0310412024
ORDER
CC.No.1604 of 2021
1 4I{.
o
( (<br>oo-) 17 ]{AY 2[2{ ez
!
.l,t
* oEsPATcsr0 *
CC ]S CLOSED
6@(tt #"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the alleged delay in filing the final investigation report by the Investigating Officer amounts to a willful and deliberate violation of the High Court’s orders.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Venkat Reddy
Sri G Madhu
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
