Disposed

Gandi Mallaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC14 Nov 2024WP/7684/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a demarcation and survey notice for land in Ahmedguda Village while a civil suit was pending. After the petitioner's death, the court disposed of the petition by directing authorities to notify the legal heirs and other interested persons before any fresh survey acting on respondent No.4's application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue notice to petitioner Nos.2 to 6 and other interested persons before any fresh survey; miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.

Gandi Mallaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32e6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 7684 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Gandi Mallaiah, S/o. Late Gandi Chiftari, (Died as per LRs P2 to P6) Aged about 85-years, Occupation:Agriculture, R7o. H.No.2-10, Ahmedguda Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District.

¶9

Gandi Yadagiri, S/o: late Gandi Mallaiah, aqed about 58 vears, Qcc^{Agriculture,R/o: H.No. 2-86, AhmedgudaVillage,KeesaraM6ndal,} Medchal-Malkajgigi District.

¶10

Gandi Shanker Goud, S/o: Late Gandi Mallaiah, ag@d about 56 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o: - H.NO.3-49, W.S. Colony, Ahm-edguda Villag-e Keesara Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶11

Gandi Sathyanarayana, S/o: late Gandi Mallaiah, aged about 54 years, Occ: {gqicul!u19,^{Rl/o:H.No. 3-48 AhmedgudaVillage, Kbesara Mandat,Medchat} Malkagiri District.

¶12

Gandi Srinivas Goud, S/o: Late Gandi Mallaiah, aged about 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: H.No.2-10, Ahmedguda Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal Malkajigiri Diskict.

¶13

Thigulla Laxmi Bai, Wo: late T. Lingam Goud, D/o: late Gandi Mallaiah, Aged -a_bout^{a8 years, Occ: Household Rl/o: H.NO.2-10I3 AhmedgudaMllage,} Keesara Mandal Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶14

(Petitioner Nos.2 to 6 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased Petitioner No.'l as per C.O. dt:14111120241.A No.1/2022)

¶15

,..PETITIONER

¶16

AND

¶17

Th_e State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue Department) B.R.K.Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad Telangana State

¶18

The Commissioner, Survey and Land Records At Hyderabad, Telangana State

¶19

The Assistant Director/ lOS, Survey and Land Records, Medchal -Malkajgiri ,:.r. District Telangana State

¶20

P.Sridhar Reddy, S/o. Sio. P.Pratap Reddy Agqd about 75^years, Occupation Business R/o. H.No.1-1-365/4, Siddam Shetty Towers, Flat No.D-104, Jawahar Nagar, Hyderabad

¶21

...RESPONDENTS

¶22

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, rJeclaring the action of the 3rd Respondent herein in issuing noiice vide Rc. No.A3/1291 l2O2O dated 1gt}3t2}21 for demarcation and survey of land in Sy. No.25,^j26 and 30 situated at Ahmedguda Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, while civil Suit OS No.61712020 is pending adjudication before Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Malkajgiri and without considering the objection submitted by the Petitioner on 2410312.021 as arbitrary, illegal and without^jurisdiction and consequently set aside the Notice Rc. No.431129112020 dated 1910312021 issued by the Vl Respondent herein.

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of demarcation and survey by the 3rd Respondent pursuant to Notice Rc. No.A3/129112020 dated 19.03.2021 , pending disposal of WP No. /2021 .

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N. PRAVEEN REDDY

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'l to 3: GP FOR REVENUE

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI V. HARI HARAN

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{C. V. BHASI(AR REDDY}

¶30

WRIT PETITION No.^{7684 of 2O2L}

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

¶33

This writ petition is filed^{seekingto declare the action of} respondent No.3^{in issuing notice.videRc'No'A3/129112O2O} dated 19.032.021^{for dernqrcation-and survey of land in survey} Nos.25, 26 and^{3O situated at AhmedgudaVillage' Keesara} Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri^{District, while a civil suit vide} O.S.No.617 of^{2O2O ispending adjudication before the} Additional Junior^{Civit Judge, Ranga Reddy District at} Malkajgiri, and^{without consideringthe objections submitted by} the petitioner^{on 24.03.2021 as arbitrary and illegal and for} other approPriate^reliefs.

¶34

It is brought to^{the notice of this Courtby the learned} counsel for the^{petitionersthat pending adjudication of the writ} petition, petitioner^{No'1 has expired' As such' learned counsel} requests that^{a direction rnay be issued by this Court to the} respondents authorities^{to issue notice to the legal heirs of} petitioner No.l^{herein, who are impleadedas petitioner Nos'2 to} 6 herein in the^{present writ petition vide I'A'No' 1 of 2022,}

¶35

¶36

CVBR, J Wp_15623 _2024

¶37

¶38

before conducting^fresh survey,^{ifany, actingu pon the} application submitted^{by respondent No.4.}

¶39

In view of the same, the^{writ petition} IS disposed of directing the resoondents^{authprities to issue notice to the} !, impleaded petitioner Nos.2^{to 6'-hereinand otherinterested} t' persons in the subject land,^{before conducting any fresh survey} in respect of the, subject^{land, acting upon thc application} submitted by resPondent^No.4.

¶40

As a sequt)l thereto, miscellaneous^{petitions ifany,}

¶41

pending shall stand closed. There shall^{be no order as [o costs'}

¶42

sd/-PeH,'S+ffOllHE3l3}HRA /

¶43

//rRUE coPY// sEcnoNElFtcER^/

¶44

sEcnoNElFtcER^/

¶45

To, 1 The Princioal Secretary^{(Revenue Departmen| B'R K Bhavan' The Stateof} Telanoand, Saifabad,^{HyderabadTelanganastate}

¶46

2 iili'i:?iiil i.isii;-";,^{s r#ey ;;Gnd Retords -ct Hvdera ba d' r ela-nsanas tate} 3 iH X;;t;i;;iDii#tor7^{ro5' survevino Land Recoids,Medchal-Malkajsiri} District Telanqana^State

¶47

4 ffi;'c'c i,;-siiN.^{piireenReddv,Advocate [oP-uC]} 5 i;; dc;i" Gi^{ior. Rerenu., HilhCourtfor the stateof Telangana'at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶48

1. iji'E-ct- i" Sii V.'Hari^{Haran,Advocate(oPuc)} 7. Two CD Copies TJ

)

HIGH COURT

CVBR,J

DATED:1411112024

ORDER

WP.No.7684 of 2021

e 5lA
\ (
o Q^
,t (
'i -) 13 [E[ ?1?1
.e . ,E:
<br>+

¶57

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶58

WITHOUT COSTS

¶59

cgot'ffi

Gandi Mallaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gandi Mallaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kallem Niranjan Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Nagula Anand Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd Vs The State of Telengana

Bhanoori Nagaraju Vs The State of Telangana

Bhanoori Nagaraju Vs The State of Telangana

Gujjula Surender Reddy Vs Vejju Bhaskara Laxmi Narayana Rao Naidu