High Court dismissed WP 7329 of 2011 filed by Vijay Kumar Gupta against the GHMC and B. Amar Mohan Das regarding illegal construction as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31681
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 7329 OF 2011
Between:
Vijay Kumar Gupta, S/o. Late Bhagatram Gupta, aged about 6'l years, Occ: Business R/o. Plot No.1206, Road No.60, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to take all preventive action to stop the illegal construction in plot No. 1240, Road No.62, Jubilee Hills, being made by the 2nd respondent which is causing serious threat and infringement of civil and easementary rights of the petitioner to enjoy his houseproperty, and demolish the pillars laid on the retainer all on the Eastern side of thepetitioners property, by leaving the set back in accordance with the provisions of the HMC Act and the Rules / Bye laws framed there under.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2011 MP. NO: 9142OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleasedto direct the 2nd respondent to stop the illegal construction inplot No.1240, Road
No.62, JubileeHills' in all aspectson the Easternside of the petitioner's property,pending disposalof the abovewrit petition
l.A. NO: IoF 201 1(WVM P. NO: 1 637 0F2011)
Between:
B.AmarMohanDas,S/o.DRKPrasad,45years,occ:Business,R/o-Plotno ?zib,'H,j,i'r'rtoz Juuitee H ills' Hvderabad'
...PETITIONER
AND
petition under sectron 151cpcprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition'the HighCourt maybe pleasedto vacate theinterim order dated 21-03-2011in WP No.7329 of 2011
Counsel forthe Petitioner:SRI VNR CHAITANYA3EP'FOR SRI B.CHANDRASENREDDY
Counselfor the Respondent No'1:SRIK'SIDDHARTH RAO'SC FORGHMC Counselfor the Respondent No'2: SRIA'RAMAKRISHNAREDDY
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRITPETITION No.7329 of20ll
ORDER
Sri '/NR Chaitanya, learned counsel representing
Sri B.Chandrasen Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, on
instructions, would submit that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive.
Petition to adjudicate further.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs
As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous apptications, if any,
shall stand closed.
SD/- T. TIRUMALADEVI ASSISTANTIREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
secrt?rio-rrtcen
To,
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1511012024
ORDER
1HE sI4 16
o B
(n(
2BOEC roI
o
,+
*
f.,j ,--41g1.E! ,
:=-:
WP.No.7329 of2011
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
W
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Kumar Gupta
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
B. Amar Mohan Das
K. LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
