Writ petition challenging denial of 4th year semester registration was dismissed as infructuous after counsel admitted the cause no longer survives.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I
[31681
I I
IN THE HIGHCOURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
TUESDAY. THEFIFTEENTH DAYOF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITIONNO:13 094 0F 2013
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticte 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiledtherewith' the High Courtmaybe pleased to lssue anappropriateWrit, Orderor Directionmore particularlyonein thenatureofWritof[\4andamus,declaringtheactionoftherespondentauthorities in notpermitting the petitionersto pursuelll year, ll semesterof her B E - 2012' l3courseevenaftertheyattainedeligibilitybycompletingtheirB.E.lllyear,lst semester, andappeared in finalexaminationspursuant to the order passedin W.P.No. 560of 2012 dated 04.01.2013 as being illegal' arbitrary'
l.A. NO:1 OF2013(WPMP.NO: 1608'lOF 2013)
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin the affidavit filedin support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass ordersdirectingtheRespondentstopermitthepetitionerstoappearfortheallthe
internal and externalexamination and labs of lll year, ll semester of her B.E. course commencedfrom the April, 20'13,pending disposal of the mainwrit petition.
counser ror the Petition"' ' ,"#.tff'[.3fri'-"#AirrsHAN RAo Gounsel for the Respondents:SRI E.VENKATAIAH (SC FOR O U)
The Court made the fotlowing:ORDER
TIIIi HON'I}I-E SRI .IUSTICT.]K. LAKSHMAN
WRII'PETIl'lON No.13094 of 2013
ORDER:
Mr. Shaik Baji Baba, learned counselrepresenting
Sri U. Shanthi Bhushan Rao, learnedcounsel for the petitioners,on
instructions, would submit that the causein thepresent writ petition does not survive.
Petition to adjudicate further.
infructuous. There shall be no orderas to costs
As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneousapplications, ifany,
shall stand closed.
SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SE ON OFFICER
\
To,
l One CC toSRIU.SHANTHI BHUSHAN RAO'AdvocatelOPUCl
BSK
LS v9
HIGH COURT
DATED:1511012024
R' trrtE.sIA
a
I oo
2 7 t!c m
'l
,')
Drr'^
ORDER
WP.No.13094 of2013
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION WITHOUT COSTS
zb
6 (,t
W,
R. Rohini
N. Surekha
Osmania University
Islamia College of Engineering and Technology
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
