The petitioner challenged the conduct of a tender by the Respondent No. 3. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous, and the Court dismissed it as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENIY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN
wRtr PET|TIoN NO: 2717d OF2024
Between:
Telanoana Outdoor Media Owners Association,Flat No. 202, Kamal Aoartirent. D. No. 12- 5- 17. Viiavpuri Colonv,Tarnaka, Secunderabad. , Rep' by its Secietary Konkala Ram<!sh,S/o. Sam'baiah, aged about 49 years, R/o. Tarnaka' Secunderabad
...pETrroNER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High courtmay be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus orany other appropriatewrit,orderor directionquestioning the actionof. the RespondentNo.3, who failed to consider the representations, dated13.09.2024, 24.09.2024of the Petitioners Association in respect of issues raised forthe notificationof TenderNo 66/NAC/2024, dated 03. 09. 2024, furlherprocedurallapse in conducting online biddingTenderNo 66/NAC/2024, dated 03.09.2024,conductedby the Respondent No 3 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles14, 16 and 21 of the constitutionof lndia and consequently direct the respondentNo. 3 to issue a fresh Tender Notice following the guidelines for Biddingprocedure by cancelling TenderNo 66/NAC/2024,dt. 03.09.2024
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court maybe pleasedto stay of all further proceedings in respect of TenderNo 66/NAC/2024, dated03. 09 2024, issued by the Respondent No. 3 including declarationof the successive bidder pending disposal of the above writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MASTAN VALI SHAIK,REPRESENTIG SRI V.ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR MCPLADMN & URBANDEV Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.27179 OF 2024
ORDER:
Sri Mastan Vali Shaik,learned counsel, representing Sri
V.Roopesh Kumar Reddy,leamed counsel for the petitioner,
on instructions, would submitthat the cause in the present writ
petition does not survive as it hasbecome infructuous.
1S Recording the said submission,this writ petition
dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneouspetitions,if any, pending in this writ
petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. A. SRINIVASARE DDY I RAR i ASSISTANT
,/TRUECOPY// sEC IONOFFICER
To
t?*:33Jif3i".33",r"?"l16il[[,ffi8iJ#V:,:ilf; t"i'H?'theState ' ;i?"6;;;a, at Hyderabad lourl
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 511012024
ORDER
WP.No.27179 of 2024
lHE Sr4
n
I o
((<br>? o g,mn zr[S l'
zo
oATC HF,O
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
@ffw
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives or has become infructuous?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Telangana Outdoor Media Owners Association
State of Telangana
Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, Hyderabad
Notified Area Committee, Hyderabad International Airport Area, RGIA
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
