The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause of action no longer survived. Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed without any order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t33021
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOI.JFI
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 666 OF m13
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Adicle 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direclion declaring the order of the 2nd respondent passed in Memo No.209/201O-B j(pts),
)
d1.12.12.2o12 and consequential order of the 4th respondent passed in Notice No.33'1/GP/PNR|2O12, dt.28.12.2012, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Panchayat Act
l.A. NO: 2OF 2013(WPMP. NO: E01 0F 2013)
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the 2nd respondent passed in Memo No.209/2010-B 1(Pts), dt.12.12.2012 and consequential order of the 4th respondent passed in Notice No.331/Gp/pNR/2Oi2, dt.28.12.2012, pending disposal of the W.P.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013 P. NO: 111 OF 2013)
Between:
9.m1. i. {litlFr !V/9,P. Nqgaryja, Aged about 40 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. Flat No.G6, D.No.16-1 1-25512, Sairam Towers, SBI Officers Colony, Moosarambagh, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERYsTH RESPONDENT/sTH RESPONDENT
AND
...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/WRIT PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1.4/
RESPONDENTS 1.4
Petition under section 15'l cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 04.01.2013made in W.p.M.p. t{o,601 of 2Oi3 in W.P. No. 666 of 2013.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O. MANOHER REDDY
Counsel forlhe Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI P. RAGHAVENDAR REDDY, SC FORGRAM PANCHAYATH ,
Counsel for the Respondent No.s: SRI A. PULLA REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
i
I i I
I jI I ti ) I I : l
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.666 of 20L3
ORDER:
.Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending in this writ
petition, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
//rRUE copy// ^r3P#XrTH,J,.B+ifR
secrrKrrcen
To, 1. 2. ii,;"ff #:;ift i,ffisT^?E??t.ff,y8f; ffi J??il?t.s,a,eof 3. 4. S SEIA' EX3'f^0ERBXJflf,"Si: gSHSl .RAM pANcHAyATH 5. Two ffifj CD Copies BN GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:2910112024
ORDER
WP.No.666 of 2013
,,/'=-i:--.-
,,rristArEa"'.<br>>
q
'tf .-,,i
14 il$S fdl- :':]
c,') ::.t
,;.i/
't.
'1 ^.i
F sl:1.:i: .-.f
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
b
ntt-
-t:t
EP'
Annapuma Residency Flat Owners Association
Sai Tirumala Heights - I
Sai Tirumala Heights - II
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Panchayath Officer, Ranga Reddy District
The Divisional Panchayath Officer, East Division, Ranga Reddy District
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
