Petitioner sought writ invoking Article 226 regarding cancellation of Sarpanch confirmation. Court noted cause does not survive and dismissed petition as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
IN THE HIGHCOURT FORTHESTATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 5449 OF 2011
Between:
Pasham Sanjay Babu, S/o P.Anjaiah, Aged 33 years, Occ: Sarpanch, Lakkaram Gram Panchayat, Choutuppal I/andal, Nalgond a District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records pertaining to G.O.Rt. No.250, d|.21-O2-20O1 issued by respondent No.'1 in confirming the proceedings No.279110-B 1(Pan), dt. 22-11-2010 passed by 2nd respondent and set aside the same holding the same as illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutiona l, against the principles of natural and against the provisions of AP., Panchayat Rai act.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 6218 OF 20111
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
dispense with filing of certified copy of G.O Rt No 250, dL 21-02-2011passed by the principal secretary to Government panchayat Ra1 and Rural Development (PTSll)department.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 6772 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to continue the petitioner as sarpanch of lakkaramgrarnpanchayat, choutuppal It4andal, Nalgonda District by suspending G O.Rt.No.250,dt. 21-02-2011issued by respondent No.1 in confirming theproceedings No.279110-B'l(Pan),dI.22-11- 2010 passed by 2nd resPondent.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(vWMP.NO : 1639 OF 2012)
Between:
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition undersection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed insupport of the petition. the High court maybe pleased to vacate the interim orderpassed in wPIVP. NO.677212011in wP.NO 5449/2011 dt. 07-3-2011.
Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.JAGADISHWARREDDY Counsel for RespondentsNo.1to4:GP FOR PANCHAYATRAJ & RURALDEV -- Counsel for RespondentsNo.5 : The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
I'ao(:1 olI
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE K'SARATH WRIT PETTTION No.5449OF2011
oRDER:
Todaywhen the matter is taken up for hearrng thelearnedCouresel for petitioner woulcl submit thatthe causq in the present Writ Petition does not surviveand thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous
2 Recordingthe aforementioned submission'this petitionis dismissed as infructuous' No order as to costs.
SD/- P. PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
secrkirrrcEn
To, 19::?::i:EJ.'53X?fi SHAI^?'-%%HJ"*"f1",'."'i'i..|?l.courtrorthe ' siri.iii"ranganaat Hvderabad foUTl 3.Two CD CoPies' BSK
GJP \ ->-.
HIGH COURT
DATED:25 t01t2024
B 1HE S14 14:
a
J (\'
J
11 tfiAp 2024
DpSPATCH gg
ORDER
WP.No.5449 o12011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT GOSTS
o v
'7!b
Pasham Sanjay Babu
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Justice K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
