Petitioner sought mandamus against threatened demolition of structures on his plots by Gram Panchayat notice. After the panchayat was upgraded to a municipality and his BRS application remained pending, counsel submitted the cause no longer survived; the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 4186 OF 2013
Between:
Sri Nookala. Varun_Redly, S/o. Sri N.V.R.N. Reddy, aged about 30 years, Occ: Pilot Fyo. 3-6-543, Street No.7, Himayatnagar Htdeabad_soo 029.'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the i circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Order, Direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing impugned proceedings vide notice No.GP/MK/2013 dated 17-01-2013 and their consequent acts of threatening to demolish the structures of the petitioner over his property bearing plot Nos.21 and 22, forming survey No.79, total admeasuring 473 square yards, situated at Manikonda Jagir village and Gram Panchayat, Rajendranagar mandal, Ranga Reddy district, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable. against law and rules, the principles of natural justice and other rules and regulations and
consequently direct the respondents not to demolish the structures of the petitioner over the said property, in the interest of justice
l.A. NO: 2OF 2013(WPMP. NO:5228 OF 20131
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass an order directing the respondents not to demolish the structures of the petitioner over said property on plot Nos.2'1 & 22 in Survey No.79, admeasuring 473 square yards, situated at Manikonda Jagir village and Gram panchayat, Rajendranagar mandal, Ranga Reddy district, pending disposar of the writ petition, in the interest ofjustice
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP. NO:2389 OF 2013)
Between:
B? l"I3l1^9ggr.",t9q, Tl"G ra m pancha yat,rvlani ko ndaG ra m pa ncha yar, r{a1endranagar Mandal Ranga Reddy district.
.,.PETITIONERYR.No.4
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
(RR 2 to 5 are not necessary is this petition)
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted on 11.2.2013 in WP No. 418012013.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHYAM S AGRAWAL
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI P. RAGHAVENDER REDDY SC FOR TG.MPPS GPPS
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI DHANANJAY REDDY SC FOR HUDA
The Court made the following: ORDER
Poge i oI') '1t)No.tlStJoI2Ol.l
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.4 186 0F 2013
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the leaned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that this Court passed interim orders on 11.12.2013 at the time of admission itself. Thereafter, the Gram Panchayath, Manikonda, the respondent No.4 herein, has been upgraded as Municipality and the petitioner is paying Municipal Tax regularly and also made application under BRS scheme and the same is pending before the authorit5r and thereby the cause in the writ petition does not survlve.
Page 2 aj 2 WP No 41a6 of2013
3. Miscellaneous petitionspending,if any, in this
Writ Petition shall standclosed.
SD/- N.SRIHARI ASSISTANT R ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To,
TJ GJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:2910112024
ORDER
WP.No.4186 of 2013
e STATE
1 oA
v
qA
f,
i.C)
o [ 4 l'l[H 2[2{
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
c"e (ae,k
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Nookala Varun Redly
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the District Collector, Ranga Reddy district
The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Chevella, Ranga Reddy district
The Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal
The Gram Panchayat, Manikonda
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
