Special Bench of Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration against the deduction of a permit fee from bills payable to the petitioner, as the petitioner withdrew the petition with leave of the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Between:
WRIT PETITION NO: 6268 OF 2024 t'
M/s SKR Constructions, Rep. By its Partner Mr.S.Krishna Rao S/o. RamaRao, aged 65 Yrs., Occ. Business Rl/o, H.No.1-2-27011031N2, K.K. Road, Suryapet,Telangana
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ of l/andamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents incontemplating to deduct "permit fee" stipulated under G.O. Ms. No. 2'l dated 31-03-2022 from the bills payable to the petitioner company in relation to the works being executed by the petitioner company vide Agreement No.TSMS|DC|2023-24 dated 07-07-2023
under respondents as illegal, arbitrary and contrary the terms and conditions of the respective agreements and iurther direct the respondents not to deduct any amounts titled as Permit Fee vide GO Ms.21 dated 31-03-2022 from the Bills payable to the petitioner company by the respondents under the respective agreements.
lA NO:'l OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 e'PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim directions restraining the Respondents from making any deductions towards purported Permit Fee from Running Bills arising out execution of work pursuant to the Agreement No.TSIVISIDC|2O23-24 dated 07-07-2023 under respondent No.3 awarded in favour of the Petitioner company.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI LINGAMPELLY RAVINDER
Gounsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 to 4: STANDING COUNSEL FORTSMSDC Counsel for the Respondent No.S: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 626a of 2o24
ORDER:
Pursuant to a letter, dated 1 | .O9 .2024, given by the learned counsel for the pe.titioner to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission to wit-hdraw the Writ Petition, this Writ
Petition is posted under the caption "for withdrawal".
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPYil
Sd/. P. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR i-l' SECTIO?.I OFFICER
To,
MP
4E:
HIGH COURT
CVBR,J
DATED:1310912024
riEs14rl:
+.1
ir<br>.1.
.>
t z0t :;l
?7 1 a,
o ORDER
ts'c:rr.l (
WP.No.6268 of 2024
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1 (p P
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s SKR Constructions
The State of Telangana
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
