Dismissed

Kotagiri Usha Rani v. Sri. Kasi Reddy

Telangana HC6 Sept 2024CC/1489/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court settled a contempt case filed against police officials for alleged non-compliance of directions in WP No.3441 of 2024. The court accepted the submission that the investigation was completed and the chargesheet filed, resulting in the closure of the proceedings without penalty.

What did the court decide?

the contempt case is closed; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are closed.

Kotagiri Usha Rani Vs Sri. Kasi Reddy — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32e6 ]

¶2

¶3

I I i I I i I i I i I ! ! I u ,l i I I I l

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD

¶5

FRIDAY, TI-IE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOI.}R

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE No: 1489 ot2024

¶9

Contempt Case under Sections 10lo12 of Contempt of Courts Act'1971 to punish the respondents 1 to 3 herein for willful disobedience to the order dated 0942-2024 passed in WP No.3441 of 2024.

¶10

Between:

¶11

Kotagiri Usha Rani, Wife of Samba Murthy, Age: 43 years, Resident of H.No.301, Umavathi Apartments, Road No.3, Chandrapuri Colony, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad 500 074.

¶12

...Petitioner

¶13

AND

¶14

1 . Sri. Kasi Reddy, The Assistant Commissioner of Police, L.B.Nagar Range, Vanasthalipuram P.S., Rachakonda, Ranga Reddy District.

¶15

Sri. Ashok Reddy, The Station House Officer, Vanasthalipuram P.S., Ranga Reddy District.

¶16

...Contemnors/Respondents

¶17

Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAVI SHANKER

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR HOME

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

I I

¶21

¶22

THE HON 'BLE^{SRIJUSTICE C.V.BHASKARREDDY} coNTEMFT^{CASE No.14a9 0F 2024}

¶23

ORf,'ER:

¶24

This contemp!^{case hasbeen hled allegingviolationo{ the} order datpd^{Og.O2.2O24passed in W'P'No 344lof 2024whereby} this Court^{while disposingof the writpetition directed} respondent^{No.4 therein (respondent No'2 herein) to coml)lete} the investigation^{in Crime No.1397of 2023as expeditiouslyas} possible, preferably^{within a periodof three (O3) months lrom} the date of^{receipt of a copy of the order and hle appropriate} hnal report/charge^{sheet before the Courtconcerned'}

¶25

Learned Government^{Pleader for Home appearingfo;- the} respondents submits^{that pendingadjudicationof the cont':mpt} case, in compliance^{with the orders passed by this Court in the} wnt petition, respondent^{No'2 hereincomplctedthe} investigation in^{the said crime and also hled chargesheetT'final} report on the file^{the concerned CourtLearned Government} Pleader has also^{serveda copy of the said chargesheet'/f-rnal} report to the^{learned counsel for the petitioner'}

¶26

In view of the said^{submissions,lhis Court is cf thc} opinion that^{there is no wilful or deliberateviolation on tht: part}

¶27

¶28

¶29

of the respondents for initiating contempt proceedings against them.

¶30

The contempt case is accordingly closed.

¶31

.^Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶32

closed.

¶33

Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPU REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

sEcTtoN oFF|CER

To,

OneCCto SRI P. RAV| SHANKER, Advocate -State [OpUC]oi Telangana

¶38

Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the -State [OpUC]oi Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies CDlkam

{ il

! i i l i! i i

t j a i i .i : l

TTIGH COURT

DATED:0610912024

ORDER

CC.No.1489 of²⁰²⁴

o' l1H S14 r(.
,-r
!_l
'I
0 i ,ll[y 202t
i)t
:) ,, '.j
<br><br>

¶48

CC IS CLOSED

¶49

G)q4 g 2<sup>Io7Y

Kotagiri Usha Rani v. Sri. Kasi Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kotagiri Usha Rani v. Sri. Kasi Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vanukuri Abhiram Reddy Vs The Director General

Mr. R. Rajanna Vs IndusInd Bank Limited

Jai Prakash Singh Vs The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (Industries)

Mr. Juda Irudiyanathan Vs Secunderabad Cantonment Board

M/s Sjm Associates Vs Hari Krishna Reddy

Vade Lakshmadu Vs Sri K. Venkateswarlu